Register now to get rid of these ads!

Rat Rod problems!! (chassis question)

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by TINGLER, Apr 19, 2005.

  1. TINGLER
    Joined: Nov 6, 2002
    Posts: 3,410

    TINGLER

    ..................................
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2009
  2. flatheadpete
    Joined: Oct 29, 2003
    Posts: 10,678

    flatheadpete
    Member
    from Burton, MI

    That's how mine is set up. Works great and hasn't broken.
     
  3. jalopy43
    Joined: Jan 12, 2002
    Posts: 3,085

    jalopy43
    Member Emeritus

    Looks good man!! My tie rod sits about 1/4 "off the top of the bones. The suspension will drop about 3" with 2-3" travel needed.(at least on mine) Bring your tape measure to the rumble,you can copy my ideas. Seeya Sparky:D
     
  4. Mr 42
    Joined: Mar 27, 2003
    Posts: 1,215

    Mr 42
    Member
    from Sweden

    My Model A Roadster has 3 inches of compression suspension travel.
    my 42 has 2,5 Inches that one hits the bumpstops' quite often.
    So i say go for 3 inches and above...

    The Rod needs to go free at all time half an inch would be enough,.
    be sure to incorporate rubber bumpstops, steel should NEVER hit steel in a suspension setup, if you want to live going down the road....
     
  5. Tudor
    Joined: Aug 20, 2003
    Posts: 6,911

    Tudor
    Member
    from GA

    is that 6" pipe? seriously it looks like 3 or 4", why so big diameteR? just curious

    from over head, is everything out from under the perch and spring - I mean forward of it?

    shouldn't you be cuttin the gr***? :D
     
  6. alittle1
    Joined: Feb 26, 2005
    Posts: 312

    alittle1
    Member

    Tingler,

    What is the spring rate on the springs that you used? What's the weight of the front end with engine and body installed? What is the weight ratio from front to back (F60/R40 percent)?

    Depending on the spring rate the spring links may bind when the spring goes down forcing the link to bind to the outside. You may have to recurve the springs and add a longer link if the spring rate is too light. Your work looks good and small adjustments may all that you need to have it working perfect.

     
  7. DrJ
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 9,419

    DrJ
    Member

    I see what you're getting at...
    Is the steering arm going to ground out ad be immobilized on the bottom of the frame on bumps or worse, while braking, causing the steering to jamb..?
    Solutions if it does;
    #1 You have the spring under so you can always add a spacer to gain safe travel but it'll raise the front of the frame.
    #2 You can add leaves to make the spring not travel as far on the same "bounce".
    #3 If there's room without hitting the wishbones, you might could run the tie rod under the steering arms. Check to see that it doesn't hit through the full range of motion though. The tie rod usually tends to move up as wheels turn though so if it fits straight ahead it'd probably be ok.
     
  8. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,818

    alchemy
    Member

    Are you using Heim ends on the tie rod? If so, you can drop the tie rod to the bottom of the steering arms and gain at least another inch. If you're using regular tie rod ends, you may need to retaper the hole half way from the bottom, but you'll still be able to gain an inch.

    ---- the Dr. types faster than I do.....
     
  9. fastfrankie73
    Joined: Apr 14, 2005
    Posts: 450

    fastfrankie73
    Member

    Flip the steering arms so the tie rod is out in front , if you don't already have the steering box in.
     
  10. Hackerbilt
    Joined: Aug 13, 2001
    Posts: 6,250

    Hackerbilt
    Member

    Mr "Ackermann" told me that isn't a good idea...
     
  11. Killer
    Joined: Jul 5, 2001
    Posts: 1,569

    Killer
    Member

    that won't work.

    you need to connect the suicide mount to the rails.

    You're welcome.

    :D
     
  12. Morrisman
    Joined: Dec 9, 2003
    Posts: 1,602

    Morrisman
    Member
    from England

    Mr Ackerman told me that too, but Mr Blowtorch told him to get the **** outta dodge and then Mr Blowtorch and I bent the steering arms to a suitable new shape :)
     
  13. Cshabang
    Joined: Mar 30, 2004
    Posts: 2,458

    Cshabang
    Member

    I believe you would want about 3.5 inches of clearance between the frame and any suspension without any kind of c notch.Oh, thats at ride height. According to Wyotech anyway. My 2 cents.
     
  14. alittle1
    Joined: Feb 26, 2005
    Posts: 312

    alittle1
    Member

    Tingler,

    Can I see a picture from the front to see how the perch is mounted? Also, is the rectangular tubing for the frame going to be hole sawed to allow the 3,5 axle tubing to fit in to BEFORE welding?
     
  15. Hotrob
    Joined: Mar 23, 2005
    Posts: 589

    Hotrob
    Member
    from DFW, TX

    Tingler:

    They call it a suicide front end for a reason.
    The traditional way to set up a suicide front end is to switch the spindles.
    left spidle on the right and right spindle on the left as mentioned above. That puts the tie rod out in front instead of underneath. Thats how I was taught to do it, and I have yet to have any problems.

    Then you can set it way down without fear of hitting the tie rod.
     
  16. TINGLER
    Joined: Nov 6, 2002
    Posts: 3,410

    TINGLER


    YES. The tube will be inserted INTO the rectangular tubing before welding.
     
  17. alittle1
    Joined: Feb 26, 2005
    Posts: 312

    alittle1
    Member

    Tingler,
    I think that the spring ends are going to bind. As the weight goes on and the spring compresses, there is no way for the spring to travel with the end links that you have, The fulcrum point must be above or below the center that you now have it at to avoid binding. Binding would produce uneven loading and the front end would be unstable and unsafe at speed, BUT LOOKS GOOD!!

    If you were to compress the spring, the spring would GAIN length, where would the extra length go to? You need to lengthen the end links to allow spring to go under the mount or shorten the spring length to allow the spring to grow when compressed.
     
  18. Hotrob
    Joined: Mar 23, 2005
    Posts: 589

    Hotrob
    Member
    from DFW, TX

    I did not notice that before, but that is exactly right. The shackles should point slightly downward. Good eye little.

    So how about some of you guys chimming in on the reversed spindles. I know for a fact a few of you are running "guido". Especially you Texas guys.
     
  19. Windshields wipers on a ducks *** it will if it don't rain.:D

    Looks good to me friend. I'm thinkin' if you get 2" of travel you'll get a ton.
     
  20. Katuna
    Joined: Feb 25, 2005
    Posts: 1,822

    Katuna
    Member
    from Clovis,Ca.

    Would it be easier to configure the steering after the suspension/frame is in place? Obviosly Tingler already had his steering components. I ask 'cause this is the point I'm at with my truck. I'm wearing a hole in my scalp from scratching my head over frame design ( my arm got tired of reaching around to scratch my ***).
     
  21. fastfrankie73
    Joined: Apr 14, 2005
    Posts: 450

    fastfrankie73
    Member

    As hotrob and I said if you flip your steering arms out front you'll be home free...:cool:
     
  22. TINGLER
    Joined: Nov 6, 2002
    Posts: 3,410

    TINGLER

    Right now I'm thinking that might not be a bad idea.

    What happens when you **** up your "ackerman" anyhow???
     
  23. Killer
    Joined: Jul 5, 2001
    Posts: 1,569

    Killer
    Member

    fine, since my smart ***ed comment didn't even get as much as a smile from ya, I'll give you my opinion.

    It looks fine.

    You're doing it right. Set up the suspension (no motor/trans) with the shackles level. When you load it, the spring will comress, and the shackles will be at approx 45 degrees.. which is what you want.

    With most of the weight on the front end, it'll come down approx 3in. An another inch or so after you drive it.

    Steering arms look like they'll be ok in the pic. You can heat em with the torch and bend em down.As long as they go straigt down, ackerman won't be affected. I have a digram somewhere that shows how to check akerman, I'll see if I can find it.

    Or dropped steering arms work well.. use Ch***is Engineerings arms, beter than Speedways.

    I personally don't put the tie rod to the front... cause it looks stupid... and you can't hide the steering dampner very well with the tie rod hanging out in the breeze!

    Tack everything WELL and put the motor/trans in it. You'll see what you need to change... if anything.

    So, in conlusion:

    you still need to connect the crossmember to the rails.

    :D
     
  24. TINGLER
    Joined: Nov 6, 2002
    Posts: 3,410

    TINGLER


    Bwhahahahaha.... :D

    seriously, that was funny. I laughed here, just not on screen! :D

    Thanks for the suggestions, Killer.
    I need all the help I can get. :)
     
  25. Killer
    Joined: Jul 5, 2001
    Posts: 1,569

    Killer
    Member

    BTW, the spring on my hot rod is about and inch or so away from the tie rod and I haven't hit it...

    yet.

    :D
     
  26. Mutt
    Joined: Feb 6, 2003
    Posts: 3,218

    Mutt
    Member

    Turn your wheels right and left and see how the tie rod moves - whether it contacts the hairpin. If not, you're fine. If you want piece of mind, get the deeper dropped arms as killer said. If you heat the arms, make sure you do it right. Speedway has directions in their catalog.


    Mutt
     
  27. Unkl Ian
    Joined: Mar 29, 2001
    Posts: 13,509

    Unkl Ian

    The shackles are fine the way they are.

    Putting the tie rod on the front looks like a huge afterthought,
    and ****s Up the Ackerman effect.Cl***ic case of bad planning.

    If I was real concerned about banging the crossmember into the tie rod,
    I'd move the spring back behind the axle.This would get the crossmember
    behind the tierod.Clearance issue solved,and it would look a Hell of a lot better than hanging the tie rod out front.Take a look at the front end of Frankenshine.
     
  28. Hot Rod To Hell
    Joined: Aug 19, 2003
    Posts: 3,036

    Hot Rod To Hell
    Member
    from Flint MI

    One major thing that I would change, is that I would probably find something more substantial than a C-clamp to moung the spring to the frame!:rolleyes: :D
     
  29. Gregg Pellicer
    Joined: Aug 20, 2004
    Posts: 1,347

    Gregg Pellicer
    Member

    Look's to me like the perch wraps all the way around crossmember.I don't think it need's to go all the way around.If it just welded to back side and top of crosmember look's like it would get you another 1/2 to 1" of clearance.JMO GREGG
     
  30. alittle1
    Joined: Feb 26, 2005
    Posts: 312

    alittle1
    Member

    Tingler,

    I know what you are saying, but standing on it does not load the spring as much as dressing it with a engine, trans, rad with liquid, couple of lights and driving it over a city street does. Hang about 800 lbs of sand bags over your 3.5 round and tell me how it works! What I was tring to stress to you was that a spring will GROW in length as you compress it, where does the extra length go to? IF the spring rate is too light the end links will bind if they look like your picture. IF the spring rate is too heavy the spring will not absorb the road shock and the front end will 'dance' and become unstable. My concern would be for your safety, not the good looks. You just need to tweak it a bit. Everyone has given you good information, just let it sink in and you will understand what they're saying.

    Just remember that you can have a 'killer' looking car when its standing still, but it may bite you in the *** at 60 mph and you hit a series of ripples in the pavement.(read bumps, potholes, etc.)

    Speedway may have designed it but they ***ume no responsibility how you install it. Ford designs cars every year and they recall them too.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.