Register now to get rid of these ads!

Real FE or 5.0 for my roadster?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by FritzTownFord, Apr 25, 2008.

  1. FritzTownFord
    Joined: Apr 7, 2007
    Posts: 1,020

    FritzTownFord
    Member

    This is my first thread and I'd appreciate some experienced input on this choice.

    Through some luck and hard work I am starting a '32 roaster project this summer. My time is really limited so I'm starting with a Brookville "roller" package to give me a running start. I can't be so pure as to build it for an exact moment time except to say really close to this pic. (thanks whoever?)

    So what engine to run? Read my avatar - Ford is a given. I always thought I would run a warmed up 5.0 / t-5 in any roadster I would build. But I ran across these guys in Georgia called Southern Automotive. They specialize in FE engines and their site lists 406 and 427 FE engines in same price range as Ford Motorsports small blocks. Anybody have experience with them? And do you guys think the FE would keep me out of the "belly button" category? I would use a top loader 4 speed behind it and I want to pound it good.

    Thanks for any ideas.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. metalman
    Joined: Dec 30, 2006
    Posts: 3,297

    metalman
    Member

    Definatly wouldn't be belly button and I'm a big FE fan so I'd be partial. Will probably need a big shoehorn, If I remember right Grey Baskerville had a FE in his Duece roadster and had hood blisters to clear everything.
     
  3. F&J
    Joined: Apr 5, 2007
    Posts: 13,279

    F&J
    Member

    406 has a nice ring to it;)

    besides, what are you building a streetrod....or a hotrod?:D

    Toss the hood and show it off.
     
  4. Tbomb428
    Joined: Aug 18, 2006
    Posts: 506

    Tbomb428
    Member
    from SoCal

    I love FE's too. And a bonus is that they started in '58, so you can still have the vintage appeal with some of the old speed equipment. It would definately get you out of the bellybutton category. FE, big in/out toploader, 9"....sounds great to me!

    I'd check with the FE forum to see if some members there have had some history with Southern Automotive.
     
  5. Maricopa
    Joined: May 18, 2007
    Posts: 45

    Maricopa
    Member

    Southern Automotive has a great rep in the Cobra replica world. Check Club Cobra too.

    Love the roadster!
     
  6. F&J
    Joined: Apr 5, 2007
    Posts: 13,279

    F&J
    Member

    Just a thought for that type of highboy; have you considered a Y block? Maybe with trips and stock style (but chrome) valve covers? That's a real pretty motor...and rarely seen in a 32.
     
  7. FE. No question. Can't wait to see it.
     
  8. toadfrog
    Joined: Dec 2, 2006
    Posts: 299

    toadfrog
    Member
    from Arkansas

    My vote is for a FE.....
     
  9. yekoms
    Joined: Jan 21, 2007
    Posts: 1,088

    yekoms
    Member

    "FE...FE...FE..." just keep sayin' that before you go to sleep everynite. Jam it back into the firewall as far as you can. There is a guy around here that has an FE in an orange 32 roadster with tri power and a four speed and no hood sides.
    We have a couple rod runs commin' up in the next few weeks I'll try to get you some pics of it.
    ITS COOL...tons of torque it gotta be a blast to drive.
    It ain't belly button it's tits...
    Smokey
     
  10. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,757

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    [​IMG]

    Another vote for the FE. I'm trying to use all the details that make it an early FE with the baldy style VCs with no breathers.

    [​IMG]

    Not a Ford set up but it'll do with my budget.:D

    There was a time when a SBF was different and attracted attention but there is no wow factor for them anymore.
     
  11. Tripower FE, A friend in High School has a 62 406. I loved that car.
     
  12. thatredcaroutside
    Joined: Mar 20, 2004
    Posts: 303

    thatredcaroutside
    Member
    from Decatur,AL

    A friend had a 390 in his 34 5W and he stretched the frame rails 4 inches for it to fit then for fun stretched the front fenders and hood. It wasn't out of proportion when he finished. Craigs' would be the only FE at the local shows or cruise in.
     
  13. tomslik
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 2,161

    tomslik
    Member

    FE.
    we DON'T need another 5.0 anything...
     
  14. FritzTownFord
    Joined: Apr 7, 2007
    Posts: 1,020

    FritzTownFord
    Member

    Thanks guys! I was already diggin' the 406, so it didn't take much. I've been staring at a premo set of 59 T-Bird valve covers that have been on my shop wall for a few years callin' to me. Just missed a pair of Holman/Moody's last year too :- /

    Tommy, you have a nice set-up workin there. I was also thinking 3/2's -
    So I guess I'm in the market for a 3/2 set-up now.

    I considered a Y-block but they seem real long with the iron water pump and stuff. I'm gonna need to buy a built engine because I don't have any machine shops within a couple of hours from here.

    I recall a thread on here that had dimensions and engine weights but I can't find it. I normally like full hood but if I need to run open sides so be it.
     
  15. Casey
    Joined: Nov 8, 2005
    Posts: 3,293

    Casey
    Member Emeritus

    talk with skotz here on the board , he`s been running a 427 fe in his orange
    32 5 window since the 70`s
    I would move the radiator foward and have a longer hood made instead of
    setting it back in the fire wall and loosing all your leg room .
    nice roadster !
     
  16. FritzTownFord
    Joined: Apr 7, 2007
    Posts: 1,020

    FritzTownFord
    Member

    Good tip, I'll PM him. The reason I'm building a deuce is for the leg room (and the girth room unfortunately) Is Skotz the full fendered car I see around Texas?

    I'll look you up at Temple next week too.
     
  17. Villlage Idiot
    Joined: Dec 30, 2005
    Posts: 407

    Villlage Idiot
    Member

  18. BillBallingerSr
    Joined: Dec 20, 2007
    Posts: 651

    BillBallingerSr
    Member
    from In Hell

    TLI Racing Engines is in Medina, TX. Ty Loftstrum knows his way around an FE, even though his last couple of EMC entries were Mopars. Good guy, you might want to give him a holler. He isn't all that far from you. Here's his website:

    http://www.tliracing.com/FEford.html
     
  19. fab32
    Joined: May 14, 2002
    Posts: 13,985

    fab32
    Member Emeritus

    OK, up front this is coming from a small block/big block Chevy man. You've already picked a bitchin roadster to copy with the picture you posted, outstanding. Now get yourself a 390/406 Fe tri-power/top loader 4 spd. / 9"rear and never look back. A rich kid at my high school was given a '62 406 tri-power 4spd car for his graduation and I'll NEVER forget the thrill of riding in that car. Be sure to share the build with us and I call shotgun if I ever see you after the build.

    Frank
     
  20. AnimalAin
    Joined: Jul 20, 2002
    Posts: 3,416

    AnimalAin
    Member

    My roadster has a late (hyd roller) 302, and I am very pleased with it. Having said that, a FE would certainly be bitch'n. Go with a Tremec five speed, and you are on the way to having a legendary car.

    Speaking of legendary cars, Skot's coupe is right up there. The FE powered roadster was Bill Burnham's baby blue '29. If you have access to a library of older magazines, check out PHR in the late 60s for coverage of Tom McMullen's highboy; it got a blown 427 FE in the second half of the decade.
     
  21. panic
    Joined: Jan 3, 2004
    Posts: 1,450

    panic

    The engine is whatever size you say it is.
    If you want traditional appearance use the FE.
    If not, closed hood etc. use a 385 - more power, cheaper, easy to find.
     
  22. mratt
    Joined: Nov 17, 2006
    Posts: 118

    mratt
    Member

    I have both SBF and FE. SBF is the fit. Roller
    motors with early intakes are cool and nobody
    can tell the difference. FE would impress certain
    people. Can't deny that. My choice is SBF.
    You have to build it for YOU, not us.

    Best,
     
  23. Henry Floored
    Joined: Sep 18, 2004
    Posts: 1,370

    Henry Floored
    Member

    Cool. If you're into Fords you have a lot of nice choices......

    Flathead

    [​IMG]

    Y- block

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    FE

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    small block

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    MEL

    [​IMG]


    and the big'uns

    [​IMG]


    Just like a Vegas buffet!

    Oh and here's the FE powered roadster.....

    [​IMG]
     
  24. Cshabang
    Joined: Mar 30, 2004
    Posts: 2,458

    Cshabang
    Member

    sounds like a real choice to be made...but I'd go FE...and well, I will be when I build a certain car I've been thinking of..unless my 14 to 1 289 needs a new home....damn it, I'm in the same boat as you now..haha
     
  25. Tbomb428
    Joined: Aug 18, 2006
    Posts: 506

    Tbomb428
    Member
    from SoCal

    If I remember correctly, FE's weigh around 650lbs (not too bad) Then, if you run aluminum heads & intake, it's much less (those iron intakes are monsters!).
     
  26. garcoal
    Joined: Nov 15, 2006
    Posts: 277

    garcoal
    Member

    i have a 428fe in my tbird its a good solid engine but repairs and performance items are 3 to 4 times more expensive also poor fuel mileage few choices if you want to fuel inject i would chose a little more modern disign if i was starting with a clean slate
     
  27. Choptop
    Joined: Jun 19, 2001
    Posts: 3,303

    Choptop
    Member

    F.E. Specialties, Sacramento, CA

    EXPENSIVE to build.

    get rid of the iron intake, it weighs about 10,000 lbs.
     
  28. groove
    Joined: Jan 13, 2008
    Posts: 74

    groove
    Member
    from kelowna BC

    Either motor will put a smile on your face, it may just be bigger with the FE. I like mine.:D Swap aluminum heads and intake on for a major weight savings on the front end. As its been posted before, they are cast iron monsters to say the least.
     
  29. BillBallingerSr
    Joined: Dec 20, 2007
    Posts: 651

    BillBallingerSr
    Member
    from In Hell

    Here is a page that gives dimensions and weights for Fords engines

    http://www.mustangsandmore.com/ubb/EngineDimensions.html

    Working on a '35 Ford pickup and I can tell you that you have to use the short water pump and timing cover from a '94-'95 Mustang for a 302 to fit. The FE as it is will actually be no appreciable amount longer, it will be wider and taller, but height on a '30's Ford isn't really an issue. If you are having to do special fitting. why not keep it '50's style? An FE was definitely a hot swap back in the day in the early Fords, the early Hemis took up even more room. And, a motor is only expensive if you make it that way. A reliable 400 hp FE can be done as cheap as a 400 hp 302, and will be much more fun to drive. Mileage will be about the same.

    If I ever stray from the flattie in the '35 Tudor Humpback, it will be an FE. Just a nice 400 hp 390 built out of "junk" I have laying around.

    JMO
     
  30. metalman
    Joined: Dec 30, 2006
    Posts: 3,297

    metalman
    Member

    I stand corrected, it was Burnham's instead of Baskervilles that had the FE. Damn, memory gets shorter with age for sure.
    I'd find a tri-power for it for sure, nothing sounds like or feels like an FE with 6 barrels sucking air!(fond high school memory)
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.