Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Rear axle not perpendicular to the frame

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Dino 64, Jul 19, 2021.

  1. Dino 64
    Joined: Jul 13, 2012
    Posts: 2,498

    Dino 64
    Member
    from Virginia

    Thanks, it will be up on a lift. No pan hard. Rough measurements shows about 1/4” difference. I think loosening the coil overs will be enough, we’ll see.
     
    lothiandon1940 and loudbang like this.
  2. Thinking this out in my head ( I know a scary thought ! ) If you were to shorten the upper passenger bar the same as what you lengthen the upper drivers side bar, I believe the angle would remain constant on them and you would get the desired effect you are after. Of course you would have to move the lower bars accordingly to set the pinion angle. Only problem is it would bring the passenger side in a bit. Best of luck on whatever you try tomorrow.
     
    lothiandon1940, loudbang and Dino 64 like this.
  3. Dino 64
    Joined: Jul 13, 2012
    Posts: 2,498

    Dino 64
    Member
    from Virginia

  4. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,471

    RodStRace
    Member

    So your 4 link should be triangulated, not parallel, as you mentioned in the first post.
    However, I looked online and the Brookville model A style chassis seems to be parallel, the 32 style frame is triangulated. The pics are such I can't spot which it is.
    EDIT: Found this pic on your older posts, so it is a 32 style.
    I'd be more comfortable doing this on your blocks shown. it looks like enough room to do the job.
    You can make lines on the floor to check square with a plumb bob easier than having it 6 feet in the air. NICE car, BTW!
    [​IMG]
     
  5. Dino 64
    Joined: Jul 13, 2012
    Posts: 2,498

    Dino 64
    Member
    from Virginia

    0D38F618-1B69-4EB3-95D1-957DABA7AB96.jpeg 6DD809FB-0A8E-417D-B124-E8FC5E665103.jpeg Gee !! Thanks. Brookville did special for me. This chassis model has a ladder bar rear. I wanted triangulated so they adapted it to a have the link mounts. They also welded tabs on the rear in their jig. 784A9B58-203F-4CB2-B25F-D4E307431700.jpeg
     
  6. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,471

    RodStRace
    Member

    So the rear of the 4 bars are welded, so you can't adjust in place. They must at least be disconnected at one end (front would be easier) to adjust.
    You have to make the call, minor adjustment with coil overs in place, moving the axle back on the left and toward the left to center, or block up the axle, support the body and remove everything (4 links, coil overs) and start over. Your measurements and efforts each way to determine which.
    Once complete with each measurement where you want it, each bar should be able to be unbolted at one end and slip out and back into alignment without forcing anything. No binding or preload. If this was a race car or super light and you wanted to compensate for driver weight and axle torque, some preload might be nice. It might be something you fine tune later, but get it square and centered first.
     
  7. Dino 64
    Joined: Jul 13, 2012
    Posts: 2,498

    Dino 64
    Member
    from Virginia

  8. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 35,165

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    It is that an optical illusion from camera angle ore are both rear tires pointing in at the front?
    Who did the welding on that axle and was it checked for true after the welding? For that matter was it ever checked for true before it was cleaned up and welded on?

    Unless my 74 year old eyes are totally out of wack both wheels are pointing in at the front while as far as that left one is pointing in the right one should be pointing out to match.
    Dino 64 A L (2).jpeg Dino 64 A rt 2.jpeg
     
    palosfv3 likes this.
  9. fabricator john
    Joined: Mar 18, 2010
    Posts: 318

    fabricator john
    Member
    from venice fl.

    upper bars .add length on the tight side and subtract equal on the loose side , for l to r adjustment the lowers do nothing on a triangulated setup, its the uppers that manage your l to right and the lowers handle the squareness in the car , and if your pinion angle (another topic but with car on ground on the tires the angles of both ujoints should be the same) lift lightly by chassis on stands take loose coil overs , set back down chassis on blocks to ride height , take both uppers loose. make tight side longer and count the turns and add that many to the other . have a buddy scootch the rear till ya can get the bolts in ,repeat till it looks right , just be sure to count so it all stays square ,,, smiles for miles

    fabricator john
    miss you dad
     
    Last edited: Jul 21, 2021
    ottoman, milwscruffy, Dino 64 and 3 others like this.
  10. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,471

    RodStRace
    Member

    Chev, I'm sure it's perspective (vanishing point) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanishing_point
    exaggerated by the model A body being wider at the front of the rear wheel well are than the rear, but that's a good additional measuring point.
    I'd imagine that it would hardly be driveable if it had a bunch of rear toe in.

    John, yep! But tighten bar on top to pull axle over on tight side, loosen on loose side. Since he has to disconnect to adjust, this will be a try and check, not a twist and watch...
     
    Last edited: Jul 21, 2021
    lothiandon1940, Dino 64 and loudbang like this.
  11. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 35,165

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I hope that is what I am seeing.
    Back when I was doing front end alignments every day after I got caster and camber set where I wanted them I'd center the steering wheel and lock it down with the wheel holder and then sight down the sides of the tires to the rear tires to see which front tire needed to be adjusted first.

    It's hard to tell what's off without actually being there and measuring though.
     
    Dino 64 and RodStRace like this.
  12. WiredSpider
    Joined: Dec 29, 2012
    Posts: 1,275

    WiredSpider
    Member

    Another thing
    On your chassis photos the 4 bar bolts don,t look like they engage the nylon on the nylock nuts.
    If they are still like that you might want to fix that.
    Either that or I,m seeing things,which is a possibility
     
  13. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,471

    RodStRace
    Member

    Chev, I bet you got cross-eyed doing Ford I-beams with a wider front track and that goofy angle!
     
    Dino 64, lothiandon1940 and loudbang like this.
  14. krusty40
    Joined: Jan 10, 2006
    Posts: 872

    krusty40
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Lots of good info here on how to solve the alignment/clearance problem. What concerns me, looking at the pictures of the links, is that to my eyes the bolts are not protruding out of (what appear to be) the nylock nuts. Common accepted practice is for the bolt to extend about 3 threads past the end of the nylock
    (assuming a fine thread bolt). If not, you do not have a true bolt locking torque value, nor do you have any safety margin.

    vic
     
  15. Correct on the minimum 3 threads showing. Back in the 1980's I was a NSRA safety inspector for 4 years, boy the stories I could tell....
     
    Dino 64, lothiandon1940 and loudbang like this.
  16. I don’t like seeing coil overs mounted on that angle ,,,,binding situation .
    Yes,,,,many are mounted that way,,,,,it is still a binding situation as they travel through their arch .

    Tommy
     
    loudbang and Dino 64 like this.
  17. Dino 64
    Joined: Jul 13, 2012
    Posts: 2,498

    Dino 64
    Member
    from Virginia

    Thanks guys for all the helpful suggestions. Got it up on the lift today and adjusted the links. Spacing is better but needs a bit more in the same direction. The problem just might be the body. It’s not rubbing except over a big bump. Getting there.
    The bolts on the links were too short. Was corrected before the body went on. Chassis pic is old.
     
  18. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,471

    RodStRace
    Member

    Glad to hear, however, one more thing (isn't there always), nylock nut are assumed to be one time use.
    Get it where you are happy, then replace them.

    Re the body, if the frame is square, you should be able to measure how much overhang the body shows from the frame outward on each side and compare. If it is kicked over a small amount, you may be able to loosen the body mounting bolts and bump it to center it better. Remember there are a lot of things this may affect, depending on how far off center it is.
     
  19. Dino 64
    Joined: Jul 13, 2012
    Posts: 2,498

    Dino 64
    Member
    from Virginia

    Good point, those bodies are so flexible, it’s entirely possible. Called Jason Slover at P&J’s. Last resort, get a wheel spacer :eek:
     
  20. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,471

    RodStRace
    Member

    Just be careful, I don't want you to get it just to the right point and suddenly hear the paint crack, the trunk lid pop, or some other major uglyness.
     
    fauj, loudbang, alanp561 and 2 others like this.
  21. Dino 64
    Joined: Jul 13, 2012
    Posts: 2,498

    Dino 64
    Member
    from Virginia

  22. gary macdonald
    Joined: Jan 18, 2021
    Posts: 409

    gary macdonald
    Member

    A wheel spacer will work , if everything else fails . Not the best solution for such a nice set up .
     
    X-cpe and Dino 64 like this.
  23. Dino 64
    Joined: Jul 13, 2012
    Posts: 2,498

    Dino 64
    Member
    from Virginia

    Thanks for the kind words. I’m happy with it.:);)
     
  24. mgtstumpy
    Joined: Jul 20, 2006
    Posts: 9,237

    mgtstumpy
    Member

    It could be camera angle however it appears that the axle tubes aren't parallel to rear cross member and that LH side may be biased towards the front of the car? If not and axle is square, rear cross member isn't square in frame? I see more axle tube on LH side when compared to RH side. Or is it the way the suspension is sitting, is chassis level at rear?

    upload_2021-7-23_8-51-0.png
     
    alchemy, loudbang and Dino 64 like this.
  25. Dino 64
    Joined: Jul 13, 2012
    Posts: 2,498

    Dino 64
    Member
    from Virginia

    So the floor is lower on the drivers. The suspension is lower on that side. This chassis came from Brookville bracketed. Everything on the chassis is square. Also the pumpkin is not in the exact middle of the axle.
     
    loudbang and Just Gary like this.
  26. Dino 64
    Joined: Jul 13, 2012
    Posts: 2,498

    Dino 64
    Member
    from Virginia

    544D0CE9-017F-41E6-89F4-A8D40AFDA3B2.jpeg 717B05CF-8A89-4302-8140-43DF0B2BFE7D.jpeg 3C51B083-729A-495E-AE92-F244F36F732C.jpeg Before and after. Not perfect but an improvement.
    Pics might be backwards but you’ll figure it out 09AF6DD2-D38F-48B6-A363-549CAA37A22C.jpeg
     
  27. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,471

    RodStRace
    Member

    Looks better! Thought you had said you were using a 4 post, not a 2 post. Ignore if this is just somewhere else. Hope the final tightening was done with suspension fully loaded.
    Also, did you try having someone hang out of each door and look at clearance when the body/chassis is leaning?
     
    lothiandon1940, Dino 64 and loudbang like this.
  28. Dino 64
    Joined: Jul 13, 2012
    Posts: 2,498

    Dino 64
    Member
    from Virginia

    Was always a two post;)
    Yes we looked at it from all angles. Brought it up and down a few times to double check. Seems to steer nicely, no difference turning right or left. After we were done I drove up the foot hills of the Shenandoah valley, no issues other than the smile on my face !:):)
     
    loudbang, ottoman, RodStRace and 3 others like this.
  29. BamaMav
    Joined: Jun 19, 2011
    Posts: 6,969

    BamaMav
    Member Emeritus
    from Berry, AL

    I think I’d add a 1/2” spacer on both sides to account for loaded sidewall bulge.
     
    RodStRace, lothiandon1940 and Dino 64 like this.
  30. Dino 64
    Joined: Jul 13, 2012
    Posts: 2,498

    Dino 64
    Member
    from Virginia

    Ordered 1/4” spacers, see what it looks like. Little at a time
    Thanks
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.