Register now to get rid of these ads!

rear axle

Discussion in 'HA/GR' started by 29AV8, Jan 19, 2009.

  1. 29AV8
    Joined: Jan 12, 2009
    Posts: 222

    29AV8
    Member

    what is a good pinion angle for a solid mount rear axle 9" ford
     
  2. ThingyM
    Joined: Sep 4, 2006
    Posts: 812

    ThingyM
    Member

    That is hard to say, Since like you said, "RIDGID MOUNTED" My Fiat is a perfect straight line... Because there will be no movement in the rear, And very limited amount at the rear of the trans. I would just use what ever works out..Keep your trans and rearend parallel with each other..
     
  3. Old6rodder
    Joined: Jun 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,546

    Old6rodder
    Member
    from SoCal

    Yep, for rigid just keep it all in as straight a line as you can manage.
    Barring that keep it all parallel.
     
  4. as per above
     
  5. russellmn
    Joined: Jan 16, 2009
    Posts: 193

    russellmn
    Member

    I'm sure it doesn't matter much with the abuse we plan on giving the driveline, but u-joints aren't designed to work with 0 angle. The caps need to rotate on the cross some for them to live. Parallel will work quite well and make your junk live longer. Just have the trans setup for a degree or two down and have the pinion a matching angle up. So long as your mounts are stong enough, it shouldn't move around any so you can set it right on the angles.
     
  6. Old6rodder
    Joined: Jun 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,546

    Old6rodder
    Member
    from SoCal

    Now that makes me wonder that if we could get'em damn close to straight through could we replace the rollers with bushings for better load spreading? ie; One large contact area rather than a bunch of thin ones. It is the rollers that usually blow after all.
     
  7. 97
    Joined: May 18, 2005
    Posts: 1,983

    97
    Member

    Just get rid of the universals altogether , align it perfectly and use a solid shaft and couplers like any other altered!!!
     
  8. ThingyM
    Joined: Sep 4, 2006
    Posts: 812

    ThingyM
    Member

    Yep.. Thats the correct way... But we'ns is cheap....
     
  9. Old6rodder
    Joined: Jun 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,546

    Old6rodder
    Member
    from SoCal

    Man, we call'er the "Barn Job" for a reason ............ :D
     
  10. What if the universal in universal joint were tested, as in the engine/trans and rear end were out of line (relatively severely; as viewed from the top)?
     
  11. 64 DODGE 440
    Joined: Sep 2, 2006
    Posts: 4,434

    64 DODGE 440
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from so cal

    Depends on how much you call "relative severe".:D

    The universal joint doesn't know if it's out of line horizontally or vertically, so if it is within it's designed operating parameters it will work.
     
  12. Old6rodder
    Joined: Jun 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,546

    Old6rodder
    Member
    from SoCal

  13. russellmn
    Joined: Jan 16, 2009
    Posts: 193

    russellmn
    Member

    As stated previously, the u-joint don't care/know whether it's out of alignment vertically, horizontally, or at an angle. It just needs to have some angle to it.

    The bushings are out there, and work for more ultimate strength, but lifespan is considerably shorter. Luckily, they are rebuildable with new bushings if you keep an eye on them and catch 'em before it tears up the cross or caps.
     
  14. 97
    Joined: May 18, 2005
    Posts: 1,983

    97
    Member

    Yep so am I ( cheap) , I am using old junk from a Rambler torque tube ....then again I will be using a Rambler motor too.
     
  15. Joe Hamby
    Joined: Jun 6, 2005
    Posts: 405

    Joe Hamby
    Member

    Hi 97. Can you tell us about your Rambler motor? The more varity the better. Joe
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.