Register now to get rid of these ads!

Rear end hitting frame...

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 53_210, Jan 16, 2004.

  1. 53_210
    Joined: Sep 24, 2003
    Posts: 219

    53_210
    Member

    How bad for the rear is this? I've got bags, but I usually put it down for looks. Today I decided to drive it lower than I usually do and it rode better than usual, but going over a big bump, the rear end definately hit the frame. I looked under when i got home and the rear sits about 2 inches from the rubber pad (cut snubber). So yeah, how bad is this for the rear end? I would ***ume it's pretty bad, but you know what the say about ***uming...

    Derrick
     
  2. Nads
    Joined: Mar 5, 2001
    Posts: 11,875

    Nads
    Member
    from Hypocrisy

    I don't know how bad it is, but I would think that things not hitting each other would be a better situation. Just ask Muhammed Ali.
     
  3. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,790

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC

    Just think C-notch. Really it is the right way to do this.
     
  4. 53_210
    Joined: Sep 24, 2003
    Posts: 219

    53_210
    Member

    Yeah... I know that's the right way... but I'd rather do that on a car that doesn't have such a minty trunk floor. That and I can't weld yet. [​IMG] I guess I'll just give it a little more air next time.

    Derrick
     
  5. Derek,if it hits the snubber once in a while its not gonna kill it.just don't be a hero with the car too much.Come over to the island for a visit and we'll C-notch that baby,I'll give ya the good bud deal.
    Are you comin out to play tomorrow night?Bowlers from hell......Shiny
     
  6. Scraper
    Joined: Oct 1, 2003
    Posts: 91

    Scraper
    Member

    All I can say about this is that, from experience, axle bearings really don't like being your suspension.Same goes for the front, If you ride on your stops I recommend lifting the front up a bit for one, and checking and repacking your wheel bearings more often. There is a reason I tail drag now.
    But like 29 sez, bottoming out occasionally won't do it. After all, there would be no need for snubbers if engineers thought that it wouldn't happen.
     
  7. hiboy32
    Joined: Nov 7, 2001
    Posts: 2,797

    hiboy32
    Member
    from Omaha, NE

    I really agree about keeping the load off the suspension parts that arn't supposed to act like the suspension. My chevelle(I know late model) has had an incredible ware rate on tie rods and wheel bearings. On the other hand my driver/ beater 92 chevy p/u has almost 200,000 miles and I haven't had any wear probs. Both spend their life on the bump stops.
     
  8. ray
    Joined: Jun 25, 2001
    Posts: 3,798

    ray
    Member
    from colorado

    chevys are a dime a dozen, don't worry about ruining the last one by cutting out the floor! it ain't ever goin back to stock.
     
  9. poncho
    Joined: Dec 18, 2002
    Posts: 774

    poncho
    Member

    YOU *****..i drove it with no air in the back for 5 years..eveytime i see you in it,you have air in the bags..what the ****...drive it hammered,like i told ya no air in the back and 5 psi in the front...rear hitting the frame ...phh! what ever [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.