Register now to get rid of these ads!

Rear suspension picture thread

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Blue One, Oct 20, 2010.

  1. Studhud,

    [​IMG]

    Slick bar mount...;)
     
  2. Salty
    Joined: Jul 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,258

    Salty
    Member
    from Florida


    I'm not bashing here....but you need to take another look at your panhard and fix it prior to hitting a big bump and shearing those hiems off...for that application you'll be putting the heims in a bind when they hit their limits and snapping the yolk off the ball with a quickness...I'm sure it's just in mock up mode by judging by the square tube just tacked in place....easy to change at this point. Look at a speedway cataloge I believe they have a photo of one installed onna bare frame...
     
  3. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,497

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    Never noticed that, but I think he's right, the heim joint orientation should be vertical to the ground, not horizontal like that.
     
  4. my 34 coupe
     

    Attached Files:

  5. Here's a few we have recently done. IRS, 2 link & 3 link.

    Rick Erickson of Extreme Kustoms


    <!-- end of AOLMsgPart_3_12da5885-1557-442b-a941-216d43f87ae6 -->
     

    Attached Files:

  6. Not my Z on this frame:

    [​IMG]

    Again, not my Z, three link with Dana 44:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    International Harvester Panel truck with 9", torque arm and coil overs:

    [​IMG]

    47-53 Chevy truck build for the Dynacorn Corp, Dana 60 and coil overs:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    1955 Chevy with narrow Dana 60, 33" tall tires, Watts link, torque arm and coil overs:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    1957 Corvette kit car with narrowed late C4 gear:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Check out the whole album!

    http://s206.photobucket.com/home/ELpolacko/allalbums
     
  7. studhud
    Joined: Jan 6, 2006
    Posts: 1,403

    studhud
    Member

    Damn polacko have you been busy or what??? Tell me more guys than just yourself did all that work.

    Nice stuff man
    Dave Hitch
     
  8. ryno
    Joined: Oct 6, 2005
    Posts: 3,469

    ryno
    Member

    really nice stuff as usual Steve.
    keep up the good work!
     
  9. 47Ford - 1.5Ton
    Joined: Apr 22, 2009
    Posts: 116

    47Ford - 1.5Ton
    Member

  10. vendetta
    Joined: Mar 22, 2007
    Posts: 125

    vendetta
    Member

    [[​IMG]

    this setup with the dead perch on the rear works ok to eliminate side movement and eliminates requiring a panhard?nice work too.really like the watts link on the 55 chev build.
     
  11. This care has been driven a ton in the last few years. The dead perch works seamlessly. If you never saw that picture and went for a ride in that car you would never guess.



    These are taken over a few years. I do have employees, but I did do quite a bit on these.
     
  12. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,497

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    Well, here's mine, finally more or less done. On the rear of my 26 RPU. for more pics see my build thread.
     

    Attached Files:

  13. lgh1157
    Joined: Sep 15, 2004
    Posts: 1,671

    lgh1157
    Member

    Great thread, back to the top

    Keep the pics coming

    L
     
  14. 117harv
    Joined: Nov 12, 2009
    Posts: 6,586

    117harv
    Member

    HPIM6274 (Small).JPG HPIM6280 (Small).JPG HPIM6288 (Small).JPG HPIM6289 (Small).JPG I'm more of a banjo transverse spring guy, but here is a chassis i did for a customer. 4 link with panhard bar and coil overs.
     
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2016
  15. Fjant
    Joined: Mar 17, 2011
    Posts: 217

    Fjant
    Member
    from Sweden

    I see every one is running leafspring or coil over. I'm trying to build in sixties style, and don't whant to use leafspring. Did they use coil over back then? when were they introduced? Is there anyone running spiral spring with the damper on the side in their hot rod?
     
  16. I'll play along.... Not anything to out of the box, Tri-angulated 4 bar with TCI All American coil-overs and a Dart 8 3/4 rear end with 3:91 gears. Rides and drives great.
     

    Attached Files:

  17. wingman9
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 804

    wingman9
    Member
    from left coast

    Here's the rear suspension in my '32 Chevy. Sway bar to follow and some day I'll be able to afford some Bilstein coilovers.
     

    Attached Files:

  18. Jesuschrystler
    Joined: Apr 28, 2009
    Posts: 34

    Jesuschrystler
    Member

    Studhud,Where did you get those spring cups/holders and brackets?
     
  19. mgtstumpy
    Joined: Jul 20, 2006
    Posts: 9,256

    mgtstumpy
    Member

    My '35 phaeton, local GM (Holden F/E, similar to Corvair?) and 420 Jag IRS.
     

    Attached Files:

  20. Cerberus
    Joined: May 24, 2010
    Posts: 1,392

    Cerberus
    Member

    One of these days I''ll put some paint on.
     

    Attached Files:

  21. Here is my 55 Caddy project finally able to roll on its own
    [​IMG]
    And for those wondering, yes the Dead Trunk Monkey is still untouched? unmolested from its place from when I bought my car 2 years ago
    [​IMG]
     
  22. cardealer
    Joined: Apr 21, 2009
    Posts: 45

    cardealer
    Member
    from So-Cal

    Mocking up a narrowed Jag in a '59 Hillman Husky.
     

    Attached Files:

  23. Ned Ludd
    Joined: May 15, 2009
    Posts: 5,429

    Ned Ludd
    Member

    An idea for a modified DeDion axle:
    [​IMG]
    The Jag/Salisbury/Dana centre isn't shown here. The connections at the tops of the small A-arm-like links are steering ball-joints. In bump motion the axle rotates about an axis that runs through the ball-joints (this requires the inboard brakes lest the moment arm become too short). The arms define a roll centre a short distance above the road. The set-up allows cornering and launch geometries to be determined independently without one compromising the other. The axle can be constructed out of the ends of a pair of semi-trailing arms and a length of suitable tubing.
     
  24. olskoolcool
    Joined: Dec 13, 2008
    Posts: 71

    olskoolcool
    Member
    from colorado

    48 tudor, 58" 9" out of a bronco. air bags and ladder bars
     

    Attached Files:

  25. southern thunder
    Joined: Mar 14, 2012
    Posts: 226

    southern thunder
    Member

    what is the advantage of a torque arm, over a ladder bar, or four link setup?
     
  26. Ryguy442
    Joined: Jan 5, 2011
    Posts: 242

    Ryguy442
    Member
    from Nc

    Here's my ladder bar setup on my 60 Pontiac, not an easy thing to do on an X frame car but it worked out.
    ImageUploadedByTJJ1338246823.056472.jpg
    ImageUploadedByTJJ1338246841.815952.jpg
    Sorry for crappy pics
     

    Attached Files:

  27. AZAV8
    Joined: May 3, 2005
    Posts: 997

    AZAV8
    Member
    from Tucson, AZ

    Nice work. I understand the square tubes are temporary. On the upper shock tube mount, I would weld in a tube to span across the tube width so when the shock mount bolt is tightened, it doesn't collapse the tube, thus negating it strength.
     
  28. Fenders
    Joined: Sep 8, 2007
    Posts: 3,921

    Fenders
    Member

    I didn't read all the pages but I will say I don't like triangulated links, as in post #7...
    If the upper links are close together at the axle, and further apart at the front, and let's say they are horizontal....
    Then when the axle goes up or down the bars will try to pull the axle forward... or stress the bar mounting points... I don't think that's a good thing.
    I'd rather see traditional longitudinal front to back ladder bars, and a panhard bar.

    Feel free to correct me if you disagree.
     
  29. AZAV8
    Joined: May 3, 2005
    Posts: 997

    AZAV8
    Member
    from Tucson, AZ

    A torque arm accomplishes the same thing as ladder bars in preventing rear end rotation. It also takes up less space in an already cramped space. It does need to be installed with the two pivot point link at the front like Elpolacko installs.
     
  30. JEM
    Joined: Feb 6, 2007
    Posts: 1,040

    JEM
    Member

    There's a bunch of different possible front-end attachments for a torque arm, but the key here is:

    1) the lower links provide fore-aft location of the axle and, in combination with the panhard or Watts, define the roll behavior

    2) the torque arm restrains axle rotation so the front mount must restrain vertical motion of the arm

    3) the front of the arm needs to have some freedom laterally and fore-aft.

    OE GM torque-arm applications (Monza/Vega/third-gen-and-later Camaros) use a rubber, well, male-female-sort of arrangement that lets the arm move in and out and rotate and a little bit of lateral motion but not up and down.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.