Register now to get rid of these ads!

reason for non metal roof on A's and T's ??

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by full foot notch, Jan 13, 2010.

  1. ago
    Joined: Oct 12, 2005
    Posts: 2,198

    ago
    Member
    from pgh. pa.

    Being from Pittsburgh,Pa. steel mill center at one time, I believe it was because there was no rolling mill that rolled a wide enough strip of sheet metal to do the whole roof until the mid 30s.



    Ago
     
  2. nah its so you could order from the arby's drive through lol sorry i couldn't help myself
     

  3. Finally, someone has made some sense.
     
  4. 62rebel
    Joined: Sep 1, 2008
    Posts: 3,233

    62rebel
    Member

    well... if you look at how much of a ship or locomotive is CAST iron or steel, not sheet metal, or how a ship used to be made one sheet of heavy sheet steel riveted to another, then you see why cars and trucks were made on wooden framing and covered in formed sheet metal and often canvas over wire and batting, well into the 30's... then you might see how the auto body industry followed traditional carriage building in it's methods. seeing as how Studebaker started off building wagons, Henry Ford converted a standard carriage design to build his first car, and following technology of the day it WAS cheaper and faster to cut THOUSANDS of wood structure pieces than stamp sheet steel with any continuous accuracy (ask the guys building really OLD rods how often they have to do an ***-load of fitting to get a part from ONE old car to fit another of the same design). making a body light enough and resilient enough was a constant challenge for builders running engines rarely producing 80hp. wood is simply lighter and stiffer than steel, and in some instances actually stronger. the roof section was unstressed and could be made very light.
     
  5. oldcarfan
    Joined: Jan 7, 2010
    Posts: 315

    oldcarfan
    BANNED
    from missouri

    the 50's model a guys deffently started doing it because the 90's mini truckers were.
     
  6. 2Hep
    Joined: Mar 3, 2005
    Posts: 523

    2Hep
    Member

    Not sure about that, Henry Ford could have had anything he wanted at that time period, I think it was that he was too cheap to fund a bigger press to stamp out the roof as a whole sheet
     
  7. flamed34
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 818

    flamed34
    Member

    <CENTER>Here's a good example of a automotive style transfer press. It would require something similar to create a roof section. For comparison's sake, this press is about the size of a large 2 to 3 story house with a full ba*****t...the support structure of this press is below ground level with at least 2 floors worth of height above ground. Regardless of Henry's deep pockets, the technology to produce this size of a press wasn't quite within reach. </CENTER><CENTER> </CENTER><CENTER>Size wise - put it in perspective of the forming die below. The die below is simply used to put mounting holes in re-pop morris minor fenders. Keep in mind, for old Henry a stamping die would have to be produced with precision without use of CNC, CAD/CAM, etc...just good old fashioned poured molds machined and lapped by hand.</CENTER><CENTER>[​IMG]</CENTER><CENTER>[​IMG]</CENTER>
     
  8. domepiece
    Joined: Nov 7, 2007
    Posts: 154

    domepiece
    Member

    I can see the technology being a factor in the 20s and 30s or maybe even power supply being the hold back on the technology. But my 1947 Dodge Panel Truck has a vinyl roof skin.
     
  9. flamed34
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 818

    flamed34
    Member

    Dome,
    That could simply have been due to low production. I don't know the volume of 1947 Dodge Panel's produced but I can't believe it would be very high. It simply may be it wasn't worth the cost to produce such a large panel.
     
  10. chitbox dodge
    Joined: Apr 25, 2005
    Posts: 598

    chitbox dodge
    Member
    from dunlap tn

    i had read somewhere that they had issues with the first metal roofs shearing and buckling from stress because of rickety body and ch***is structures vs. the incredibly rough roads of the time.
    it claimed the initial turret tops were tested before actual production way before the 30's with practically no success. with an insert made of whatever material it created some area to flex with the rest of the car.
    but the huge press eating production costs sounds just as feasible to me too.
     
  11. Mart
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 5,004

    Mart
    Member

    If you go to archive.org and check the "master hands" video's, one of them shows the tops being pressed for the '36 Chevy line. These are full tops. Chevy got them for 36 Ford got them for 37.
    Mart.
     
  12. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma

    that also sounds like a very feasible answer to me. weren't model T roofs just flat?? You can't tell me they couldn't have bent up four corners to make a T roof. It would make sense that the way the cars were designed to flex throughout would have made closing in that top panel a problem.
     
  13. flamed34
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 818

    flamed34
    Member

    Chit...that definitely makes a lot of sense. There was a lot of give in those old ch***is...couple that with the rutted roads of the time....

    Mart...awesome site. Thanks for posting it!
     
  14. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,756

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    35 Chevy promotional picture. Probably taken in late 34. It was a big deal back then.
     
  15. lothiandon1940
    Joined: May 24, 2007
    Posts: 32,406

    lothiandon1940
    Member

    I'm sure the lack of technology was the major factor, but I understand Henry was skeptical of the "drumming" effect or "oil canning" that a full metal body might produce. The fabric inserts tempered this by absorbing some of the inherent vibrations created by the roads of the time.
     
  16. chevy3755
    Joined: Feb 6, 2006
    Posts: 1,056

    chevy3755
    Member

    Henry didnt have to tech to do it.........
     
  17. Candy-Man
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 1,715

    Candy-Man
    Member

    Henry was obviously a very wise man.... Imagine how many more vehicles he would be able to produce with the sheet, which would have been used for the roof panel?
     
  18. fastrnu
    Joined: Feb 26, 2009
    Posts: 739

    fastrnu
    Member
    from shelton,wa

    Henry Ford being a man of vision actualy forsaw the trend. While smoking opium he had a vision of mini-trucks with soft tops driving through the hood going boom baba boom baba boom. The next morning he sent out a company directive to cease production of metal skinned roofs. Thus the advent of the rollback roofed Ford. Later in the 30's when Baseball started being played on top of Chevrolets. Mr Ford seeing baseball would become an American pastime went back to metal roofs so the batters would have a more stable place to stand. truly making him a "Great Man Of Vision"
     
  19. kenny g
    Joined: Oct 29, 2007
    Posts: 172

    kenny g
    Member

    You are all wrong ,it took to long to beat a billit down that thin.
     
  20. Undercover Customs
    Joined: Mar 24, 2009
    Posts: 362

    Undercover Customs
    Member

    Freakin' hilarious!

    Maybe that's where they hung the dryer sheets.:eek:
     
  21. No Cents
    Joined: Feb 28, 2009
    Posts: 336

    No Cents
    Member



    I gotta agree with Frank.
     
  22. HOLLYWOOD GRAHAM
    Joined: Apr 11, 2007
    Posts: 1,437

    HOLLYWOOD GRAHAM
    Member
    from Ojai,Ca

    1935 Masters were their first turret tops for Chev., the Standards were still inserts. You have to remember that the technology then was in the infant stage and being developed as they tried to outdo the compe***ion. As an example mechanical brakes were the standard then hydraulics were developed and soon every mfg. would make hydraulics, now it's disc. Plate gl*** was used at first then safety gl***, wood spokes than metal spokes than solid wheels now alum. custom wheels. Solid rubber tires, then tube tires, then tubeless etc. Look at automotive lighting from kerosine to led now. Whats next?
     
  23. a bit ot, but my 29 packard came with cloth insert. the diffrence being that from the body swage line up, the whole lot is aluimium.
     
  24. cleatus
    Joined: Mar 1, 2002
    Posts: 2,277

    cleatus
    Member
    from Sacramento

    It came down to speed.
    The limit of the stamping capability at the time required making the roof from several pieces and the amount of time it would take for a worker to join all the panels together would have slowed the ***embly line too much. Wood & fabric was quicker.
    But I do like the premise of a need for body twist - I wouldn't doubt that was factored in as well.
     
  25. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    --------------------------------
    Actually, Henway was the first auto manufacturer to come out with a true 'turret top' - as an option on the sadly, 'banned after less then one year', 1926 Henway "Deluxe 'Flaming Cajones' Sports Sedan"! Not only was it a true, one piece "turret top", the turret was cast steel rather than stamped and rotated a full 360 degrees! Plus, if you ordered your new Henway "Deluxe 'Flaming Cajones' Sports Sedan" with the factory optional "turret top", for a just few dollars, you could then also order the infamous dealer-installed "Don't Mess With Me" traffic clearing option, that depending on availability and your State's Motor Vehicle regulations, added your choice of either a 37mm auto-cannon or a flame-thrower to the turret! :eek::eek::D:D

    Mart3406
    (Official Henway Motors Corporate
    Historian and Archivist)
    ===============================
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Feb 14, 2010

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.