Register now to get rid of these ads!

sbc starter fit

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by chascue1, Nov 28, 2009.

  1. chascue1
    Joined: May 19, 2007
    Posts: 31

    chascue1
    Member

    have a '63 283 engine......using an old 1957 manual bellhousing so i can change the clutch without pulling bellhousing........'57 starter came with bellhousing, is old and bolts on bellhousing with 3 bolts....would rather use new two bolt in block starter with 168 tooth flywheel......will that be a problem.......thanks in advance for answers.......charlie......
     
  2. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,222

    squirrel
    Member

    it might fit. I think the iron nose starters fit better than aluminum....might as well just use the 3 bolt style?
     
  3. wickedgoodracer
    Joined: Feb 16, 2009
    Posts: 192

    wickedgoodracer
    Member

    you'll NEVER have to shim the 3 bolt and it will always sound right
     
  4. Deuce Roadster
    Joined: Sep 8, 2002
    Posts: 9,519

    Deuce Roadster
    Member Emeritus

    I prefer the old 3 bolt style ( to the bell housing ) ... :)
    WAY less fitment issues. Plus they have IRON heads ... not aluminum :(
    Very easy to upgrade them to Big Block starter specs.

    [​IMG]

    Just use the IRON head from the 3 bolt starter and bolt it to the big block starter ( see the little brass spacer ). The big block starter is longer, tougher and cranks HARDER :D

    I have puller the engine ... without removing the starter ... with the 3 bolt style
     
  5. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 35,578

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    If you run the starter that bolts to the block I think you have to do some trimming on the bellhousing to get it to fit.

    I have the three bolt end on my 48 with the cast iron bellhousing and have swapped fields and armatures off other starters onto that end a couple of times over the years. I think the last one came off an Olds. I always replace the drive end bushing though.
    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
     
  6. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    That's what I remember too. I was working on an early 327 in a Kaiser M715. I gave up in the end and got a 3 bolt starter for it.
     
  7. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,222

    squirrel
    Member

    there are iron nose two bolt starters, that's what I meant might fit better than the aluminum nose.

    But the 3 bolt is not too hard to find, they used them on trucks thru 1972.
     

    Attached Files:

  8. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Oh, and somebody weigh in here on if the 168-tooth flywheel will fit inside the 1957 bell housing. I don't know, but it might be worth checking before he's in too deep.
     
  9. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,222

    squirrel
    Member

    yeah, the big flywheel was used on all of them back then.
     
  10. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Excellent to know, thank you.:)
     
  11. chascue1
    Joined: May 19, 2007
    Posts: 31

    chascue1
    Member

    thanks guys, now i will use the 3 bolt starter.......chascue.....:)
     
  12. It sounds like the truck style set up I've been using forever. I use the truck flywheel, clutch, starter, the works down to the cast fork. I've been using the same basic starter for years with a quick rebuild when it needs it by a local shop.

    Bob
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.