Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical School me on top loader Buick 3 speed transmissions

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Chris, May 8, 2023.

  1. Hello all, I was at a small swap meet yesterday and came home with a (I think) 1937-39 Buick 3 speed that’s been converted to Ford closed driveline at the rear. Trans looks nice inside.

    anyone know anything about these? Are they decent transmissions? I know LaSalle and Packard were often used in hot rods, Oldsmobile as well. Bolt pattern looks like Chevy? Just a neat piece I’d love to learn more about

    thank you!


    64F98A7C-F36C-4928-B6A6-7AB82C195A93.jpeg 2D8DBD0C-B68F-4521-B35D-7DD1B05FC8A7.jpeg 47D46391-42E9-4013-9699-35C4016B4C21.jpeg 3B36FE94-400D-44DD-9746-646BAD15C41E.jpeg A8BB5158-FE75-4F07-A674-43D76D7DE076.jpeg 4163C6E8-146E-42FB-A5C3-98AF5011406C.jpeg
     
    Ahughes likes this.
  2. I think it is more like 36-38, as I believe Buick went to column shift in 39. Non- synchronized first gear. Not a particularly strong unit, but will handle 100 HP. Looks like the upper mounting holes have been elongated some. A good find for a FH project.
     
  3. Ebbsspeed
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 6,440

    Ebbsspeed
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Those Buicks originally had a torque tube. Are you sure it's converted to Ford TT? Also, that appears to be the smaller of the two versions of the Buick transmission available in that timeframe. They came behind the 233/248 ci engines. The trans behind the 320 ci was a much stouter version.
     
    SS327 likes this.
  4. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,258

    alchemy
    Member

    Yes Ebb, that is a Ford torquetube ball. I recognize the ‘34 Ford mount.
     
  5. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 7,938

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    In the later Buick, three speeds, the 5-bolt top covers are the "weak" ones, the 6-bolt top covers are the "strong"ones. Are the earlier transmissions different?
     
    Hnstray likes this.
  6. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,971

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    This is definitely the stronger of the two Buick transmission choices.
     
    Ahughes, Hnstray and don colaps like this.
  7. Ebbsspeed
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 6,440

    Ebbsspeed
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    OOps, I forgot about the 5 vs 6 bolt cover.
     
  8. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 7,938

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    To the O/P (@Chris); now that that's settled, that's a super score!
     
  9. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    What is interesting about this trans is the front bearing retainer/T.O. Bearing tube. Buicks of that era didn’t have that part bolted onto the trans case. The front bearing was ‘exposed’. The stock Buick bell housing mating face served as the bearing retainer when the trans was bolted to it. It required a gasket between the trans/bell housing as the front bearing was lubed by the trans gear oil.

    The bell housing had a ‘channel’ below the bearing leading to a hole in the front of the case below the bearing that was the return path of the gear oil. If that wasn’t weird enough, the throw out bearing carrier consisted of a flanged tube that inserted into an opening in the bell housing. The front bearing retainer in the photo is adapted from something else. Perfectly reasonable thing to do, just not what the trans came with (assuming it IS the trans we all think it is)

    It was popular at one time to swap Oldsmobile upper line series transmission gears into the Buick case. I don’t recall exactly why that was popular but Frank (not his HAMB name, but recall is failing me here, but he was a prolific poster on the HAMB and an authority on this subject. Lived in the wilds of the Northeast…Connecticut I think). There will be lot of posts in the old threads that can shed a bit of light on this topic. More to it than meets the eye.

    Ray
     
  10. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 7,938

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Ray, I think it was "Fab32".

    I always wondered about the Olds gears myself; probably because they both fit and you'd use whatever you could find. They're not the most common parts out there.
     
  11. Ray, the person that you are referring to is Frank Cebula, who goes by F & J, here on the HAMB. He lives on route 32 in Willimantic, Connecticut.
     
    Last edited: May 10, 2023
    RICH B, firstinsteele and Hnstray like this.
  12. 100% Matt
    Joined: Aug 7, 2006
    Posts: 2,777

    100% Matt
    Member

    My buddy picked up a similar transmission which was marked 36 Olds. 761EF6AC-D080-44A5-A929-DD6CD43C5B3B.jpeg
     
    Hnstray likes this.
  13. Frank and I both use these behind our Olds engines. Both have been modified with newer Olds gear guts circa '51-64. Paul has used them as well. Pretty straight forward mod with one tail stock retainer bolt having to be moved. Frank did a build segment on his a while back.
     
    Last edited: May 10, 2023
    Paul and Hnstray like this.
  14. don colaps
    Joined: Nov 29, 2007
    Posts: 214

    don colaps
    Member

  15. 37slantback
    Joined: May 31, 2010
    Posts: 491

    37slantback
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Would a 1961 Olds Super 88 3-speed be a candidate donor ?
     
    Paul likes this.
  16. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    Hi Walt!

    I just KNEW there was another familiar HAMB guy who was/is knowledgeable about this subject, but dangled if I could come up with the name! And after all we have shared!:D I guess a part time memory is better than no memory….:confused:

    I am still enjoying the wonderful Maple Syrup you sent me from your brother’s ‘still’ ;) I ration it carefully but I’ll eventually run out :(

    Hope things are well with you.

    Regards,
    Ray
     
  17. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,971

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    Yes, it would.
     
    don colaps and Paul like this.
  18. Paul
    Joined: Aug 29, 2002
    Posts: 16,833

    Paul
    Editor

    I did the Olds gears and tail swap in one,
    it's a '37-'38 only Roadmaster transmission.
    I used a '58 Olds for a donor,
    all '51-'64 Olds syncromesh "selector shift" transmissions should work as donors.
    I have been running it behind a '58 Olds 371 for a few thousand miles without any issues at all.
    no syncro into first and it sounds a bit like an old truck, especially in second but I like it,
    even more than the LaSalle, and I've had several of those.

    [​IMG]
     
  19. don colaps
    Joined: Nov 29, 2007
    Posts: 214

    don colaps
    Member

    …and I’m preparing for some gear swapping action here
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: May 9, 2023
    Ahughes and Paul like this.
  20. Duke
    Joined: Mar 21, 2001
    Posts: 927

    Duke
    Member

    Are they shorter than a Lasalle when converted to closed drive?
     
  21. Ahughes
    Joined: Mar 15, 2023
    Posts: 32

    Ahughes
    Member
    from Spokane Wa

    Been wanting find one of these! Need something for my 322 nailhead, wish I could’ve made it out to that swap meet! :)
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2023
  22. tub1
    Joined: May 29, 2010
    Posts: 549

    tub1
    Member
    from tasmania

    Well done , it would have to be better than the Ford trans ,they are terrible dam things I have 3 cars I drive weekly with ford trans non of them stay in 2nd gear
     
  23. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 7,938

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Your transmissions are obviously worn and in need of some maintenance.
     
  24. don colaps
    Joined: Nov 29, 2007
    Posts: 214

    don colaps
    Member

    Done! Easy peazy, haha.
    Or maybe I should paint it. Then done.
    Or maybe also put it behind a running engine in a hot rod and try it out. Then done…
     

    Attached Files:

    Hillbilly Werewolf likes this.
  25. Just a question, I had heard the selector shift trans were weak and the obvious no (or very rare?) good shifters for them.

    Might be stronger than the Ford trans, but do they hold up behind a decent V8? Such as a 371 or 394 Olds with a little extra power over stock .
     
  26. don colaps
    Joined: Nov 29, 2007
    Posts: 214

    don colaps
    Member

    Where did you hear that?
     
  27. don colaps
    Joined: Nov 29, 2007
    Posts: 214

    don colaps
    Member

    Hello
    The throw out bearing tube was bolted to my Buick case. See picture.
    I’m pretty sure my transmission is from 1938. ID number on the case: 1298438-1

    The T.O. tube on my Olds selector was held in place by the bellhousing though. Don’t know what year model. Number on case: 1312582-2
    (I just used the Olds T.O. bearing tube and bellhousing together with the Buick case).

    IMG_6823.jpeg
     
  28. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,971

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    The version with the six bolt top is pretty rugged, and has ratios close to the Cad/LaSalle transmission. As for floor shift conversions, good luck finding one. There's another thread on here showing pictures of them, as well as a few that some of the guys made to order.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.