Register now to get rid of these ads!

Something just is not right

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by mistoo, Jun 29, 2007.

  1. mistoo
    Joined: Sep 1, 2006
    Posts: 87

    mistoo
    Member
    from Sweden

  2. Degreaser
    Joined: Nov 9, 2006
    Posts: 935

    Degreaser
    Member

    I agree. Stupid engine choice for a real steel 32'.
     
  3. SinisterCustom
    Joined: Feb 18, 2004
    Posts: 8,277

    SinisterCustom
    Member

    There seems to be alot of that going around....CROSSBREEDING.....Like a nice '40's style car with Buick drums for instance......see that ALOT.
    I don't mind it too much, guys are using there favorite cool parts from "back then" and using 'em for their own rods.....maybe not 100% "correct" for any given "era"....but still cool in my book.....
    That roadster is NICE......even though it's not an "A"....he he.....
     
  4. 57JoeFoMoPar
    Joined: Sep 14, 2004
    Posts: 6,402

    57JoeFoMoPar
    Member

    SBC in an '32 Ford? Oh yeah, rodders never souped up their pre-war stuff with smaller, lighter, more powerful OHV V8's....


    Are we reading from the same text book here?
     
  5. Vance
    Joined: Jan 3, 2005
    Posts: 2,135

    Vance
    Member
    from N/A

    Well, it could be worse. At least it's not a billet clad LS crate Vette motor.

    I have an all real steel '34 Ford 5W and I have a SBC in it. Is this a misdemeanor or a felony?

    Vance
     
  6. Degreaser
    Joined: Nov 9, 2006
    Posts: 935

    Degreaser
    Member

    misdemeanor. a felony would be a vortec.
     
  7. 36couper
    Joined: Nov 20, 2002
    Posts: 2,014

    36couper
    Member
    from ontario

    Are you kidding me? What's wrong with the SBC for that car? Did you read how far he has driven without a hiccup? Put a flathead in that car and he would have been stranded in the middle of the desert. The car was built to be driven and that is exactly the power plant to allow him to do so!
     
  8. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 58,433

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    definitely a felony.
     

    Attached Files:

  9. mistoo
    Joined: Sep 1, 2006
    Posts: 87

    mistoo
    Member
    from Sweden

    It just seems wrong to me for this car.
     
  10. Uptown83
    Joined: Apr 23, 2007
    Posts: 722

    Uptown83
    Member

    Arrest me! i did a sbc in my 33. WISH i did a ford but i dont see the big deal about it...
     
  11. Sutton
    Joined: Apr 7, 2005
    Posts: 699

    Sutton
    Member
    from BTR

    Exactly.

    You are the winner.

     
  12. SinisterCustom
    Joined: Feb 18, 2004
    Posts: 8,277

    SinisterCustom
    Member

    Yeah....it does seem a little wrong...that's because the car has a forties vibe....the SBC wasn't out then. Sure, it could be said that it was "updated" in '56 per say, but so would have the wheels/tires and other stuff to keep up with the times......so to speak......
    Can ya see where I'm coming from???? It's no different than using a new LS-1 in an otherwise late 50's(for example) car.....mixing eras........although the LS-1 guy would get a ration of shit....hahahaha!!!!
     
  13. 47bob
    Joined: Oct 28, 2005
    Posts: 625

    47bob
    Member

    I wouldn't hold my breath looking for a '32 WITHOUT a small block chevy.
     
  14. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 21,841

    alchemy
    Member

    That's a HAMBer's car.
     
  15. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,757

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    [​IMG]

    Yeah I was going to burn mine, but then I thought it might be fun to actually drive it. I'm glad I reconsidered. I figure this has been a combo for about 37 years.
     
  16. RatBone
    Joined: Sep 15, 2006
    Posts: 660

    RatBone
    Member

    Whats not right, is its not in my garage!
     
  17. At least it looks like a fifties small block,not a billet modern transplant!I just wish i had the $$ to buy it,that's the part that isn't right.:rolleyes:
     
  18. 3wLarry
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 12,804

    3wLarry
    Member Emeritus
    from Owasso, Ok

    Yeah...what the fuck was he thinkin'?
     

    Attached Files:

    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  19. Rolf
    Joined: Jul 23, 2002
    Posts: 1,835

    Rolf
    Member

    I get the 40's look with "wrong engine" comment, but I would drive that car all day long !
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  20. SinisterCustom
    Joined: Feb 18, 2004
    Posts: 8,277

    SinisterCustom
    Member

    Leave the hood closed Larry......:p :D
     
  21. hotrodbrad
    Joined: Apr 21, 2006
    Posts: 180

    hotrodbrad
    Member
    from Tempe, AZ

    whats with the recent threads started to talk shit about someone elses ride...it wasnt that long ago when the majority of threads in the first few pages were of someone making a part and posting pics of the progress...now its just a bunch of flaming, pic requests, and ot posts

    go build something...then share YOUR pictures
     
  22. Thirtycoup
    Joined: Jul 21, 2002
    Posts: 1,197

    Thirtycoup
    Member

    i hear ya larry, case closed.
     
  23. AMEN!!!You're so right,too many negative critics lately!At the same time,too many people post a thread,just to instigate these type of reactions.:rolleyes:
     
  24. Harms Way
    Joined: Nov 27, 2005
    Posts: 6,917

    Harms Way
    Member

    So What !,...... If the car wasn't actually built in the 40's as a Hot Rod what difference does it make ?,....... in fact most of the "Traditional Hot Rods" being built today is from the scrap that Restorers and Hot Rodders alike passed up back in the day, and they aren't real Hot Rods from the 40's or 50's , they are reproductions, adaptations or just plain fakes. If you want to build a car with a 40's "VIBE" with a northstar under the hood, who's business is it other than your own,....

    If your building a car to please someone else or a certan group, your building it for the wrong reason. Thats what the "gold chainers" are all about.
     
  25. teach'm
    Joined: May 8, 2005
    Posts: 322

    teach'm
    Member
    from Tucson, AZ

    Yep, it belongs to bonesy. How dare he put that ol' reliable lump into his car, then proceed to actually drive it thousands of miles? Sheesh, some people.....:D


    -Ryan
     
  26. Horsepower67
    Joined: Nov 15, 2006
    Posts: 536

    Horsepower67
    Member

    Personally I hate crossbreeding more than era-incorrect.
    But that's just me.
     
  27. SinisterCustom
    Joined: Feb 18, 2004
    Posts: 8,277

    SinisterCustom
    Member


    WHoa man...calm down...read my other post....I dig it.....but we are here to build "traditional" cars, all with a certain look......and this car HAS IT...:)
     
  28. Skankin' Rat Fink
    Joined: Jun 18, 2006
    Posts: 1,513

    Skankin' Rat Fink
    Member
    from NYC

    At least it looks like it could be a 265 or a 283. It looks fine except for the alternator.
     
  29. Muttley
    Joined: Nov 30, 2003
    Posts: 18,501

    Muttley
    Member

    That car is awesome, the only thing I'd change would be to add a Tri-Power.
     
  30. John Denich
    Joined: Nov 20, 2005
    Posts: 2,718

    John Denich

    one of you guys should click the buy it now then YOU could put any thing you want in it for an engine...back in the day guys could not yank those flatties out fast enough to put an overhead valve engine in their hot rod or custom.....I like that Hot Rod just the way it is...
    John
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.