Register now to get rid of these ads!

Street friendly ride height?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by ErikCameron, Sep 27, 2005.

  1. ErikCameron
    Joined: Sep 21, 2005
    Posts: 13

    ErikCameron
    Member
    from Loma Linda

    Looking to build something long and low and am curious what experience is out there on how much clearance there needs to be under the chassi/framerails in order to be street friendly. I plan on using mine as a daily driver to and from school. Thanks
     
  2. TINGLER
    Joined: Nov 6, 2002
    Posts: 3,410

    TINGLER

    I normally shoot for about 16" from the street to the rockers.

    ....but I would think 3"- 4" would work just fine. :D
     
  3. DrJ
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 9,419

    DrJ
    Member

    Roads around schools and in supermarket parking lots are notorious for having speed bumps that could actually be classified as "Speed Mountains" and on many occasions I have scraped bumps on the bottom of my MGB and it has 4-1/2" - 5" of ground clearance. I had to weld a "skid plate" on the header pipe!
     
  4. blown49
    Joined: Jul 25, 2004
    Posts: 2,212

    blown49
    Member Emeritus

    Back in the '50's they said that if you could get a pack of cigarettes, upright, under the lowest point in the car you could easily (?) drive it on the street but if you had to turn the pack sideways it was too low. Keep in mind there weren't may filtered cigarettes in those days. :D
     
  5. REJ
    Joined: Mar 4, 2004
    Posts: 1,612

    REJ
    Member
    from FLA

    I would not go any lower than the scrub line on a daily driver.
    Take the tires off the rims, or just put bare rims on the car and see what would drag going down the road. You would not want to go any lower than that in case you did have a flat tire. I have always heard 3" clearance under the car, but that would depend on how it was built.
    My .02 worth.
     
  6. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,318

    squirrel
    Member


    but that was before they invented speed bumps!
     
  7. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,767

    Hellfish
    Member

    i would think that it would also depend on how good/bad your roads are. With all the potholes in the Midwest, a permanently really low car could be troublesome
     
  8. Look at Denise' dads car in her last update, that car barelay passes the cig pack test.
     
  9. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 19,663

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    yeah 3 inches is usauly the lowest you can go. keeping in mind that nothing hangs under your frame rails and you dont have a 90 deg driveway ;)

    also if its a shoebox your fine but if its a land barg caddy you might want to reconsider with such a long wheel base it could change things up a bit, defintly pay attention to have far that rear hangs past the back tires as itll be scraping alot sooner now

    just some thoughts


    bags are for groceries ;)
     
  10. Unkl Ian
    Joined: Mar 29, 2001
    Posts: 13,509

    Unkl Ian

    Depends on the local roads.Some parts of Detroit,
    even the stock ride height might not be enough.:rolleyes:
     
  11. Hackerbilt
    Joined: Aug 13, 2001
    Posts: 6,250

    Hackerbilt
    Member

    I did that with my Land Cruiser!!! Sat her right down on a set of bare rims.
    Then I crawled right under on my hands and knees to get a better look.
    Everything was fine. ;) :D
     
  12. SlowandLow63
    Joined: Sep 18, 2004
    Posts: 5,958

    SlowandLow63
    Member
    from Central NJ

    my scrub line is real real low on my daily... i have just about one inch maybe a tiny bit more (4 in. blocks and 14" tires) i daily drive it and usually dont have problems i have been known to get stuck in potholes or in construction areas but otherwise im ok
     
  13. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,757

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    I remember the upright cigarette picture as bragging on how low your car was. Of course they were unfiltered Camels and Lucky Strikes. Then again we actually drove those cars on the street.
     
  14. Slag Kustom
    Joined: May 10, 2004
    Posts: 4,312

    Slag Kustom
    Member

    my 1950 caddy was set with the rockers 5" off the ground and never scraped them. rear bumper would drag in and out of a steep driveway but it had alot of overhang from the rear wheels. with the lake pipes on it, it would drag them around any hard corner (2" lake pipes plus 1/4 for the caps)
     
  15. brandon
    Joined: Jul 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,373

    brandon
    Member

    i think i lost half of my car in a pot hole in detroit....hahaha i think it must be a requirement you to have a suv to drive in town ....that was nuts.....haha brandon
     
  16. SlowandLow63
    Joined: Sep 18, 2004
    Posts: 5,958

    SlowandLow63
    Member
    from Central NJ

    enter me in the backseat hahahahaha
     
  17. chuckspeed
    Joined: Sep 13, 2005
    Posts: 1,643

    chuckspeed
    Member

    dude -

    first day of spring, there's friggin' hot dog vendors that set up inside of some of the potholes on I-96 down Livernois way.
     
    65fordguy likes this.
  18. chuckspeed
    Joined: Sep 13, 2005
    Posts: 1,643

    chuckspeed
    Member

    sreiously...


    In Socal, the ride height limit is a function of overhang and the aprons from the street into local businesses.

    For a typical old ride with typical overhangs - figure 5". I'm runnin' 6+"in Detroit on the DD with occasional speedbump rub.
     
  19. Green4.6GT
    Joined: Sep 27, 2005
    Posts: 1

    Green4.6GT
    Member
    from Regina

    i went with the 4 inches is probably good rule...


    and honestly, i dont know if i like it or not.. the lowest point on my car is like 3.75 but more or less everything else is 4-4.5.. and it rubs on EVERYTHING, drives me crazy, i have to drive into and out of everywhere on rediculous angles, potholes kill me, have to drive slow on not perfect roads etc.. my bumpers do hang out fairly far past the wheels, but still..


    it does look killer tho :cool: , so i deal with it, just because i love the look...

    if you want it to drive nicely and not worry about scraping everything, i would go 5 or so.
     
  20. Ford Freak
    Joined: Jan 5, 2005
    Posts: 827

    Ford Freak
    Member

    I had about 16" on my Falcon. Car looked a little too low, so I raised it to 18" from the rockers to the street. Also, now I don't have to worry about the infamous NY potholes,or anything that has blown into the street like a trash can, recycling box etc.. Better to be safe than sorry.:D
     
  21. My '59 Ford wagon's lowest point was 2 5/8" off the ground. it rode like shit, scraped on EVERYTHING. Damn it looked cool....... drove it daily. My Current daily ride (50 Wafarer) is much more civil at something like 5" clearance, but it doesn't LOOK low. Sometimes ya gotta sacrifice comfort for the sake of style.
     
  22. JohnnyB327
    Joined: Jul 9, 2004
    Posts: 908

    JohnnyB327
    Member

    haha
     
  23. caddyman65
    Joined: Feb 23, 2003
    Posts: 519

    caddyman65
    Member

    I also think it depends on the car.My 65 Caddy has a lot more over hang than most 50`s cars. Mine is about 6" off the ground and I still scrape on speed bumbs and driveways . I could not lower it anymore without bagging it and forget about any more passengers.Still on the fence on bagging it
     
  24. TexasHardcore
    Joined: May 30, 2003
    Posts: 5,562

    TexasHardcore
    Member
    from Austin-ish

    if you can push pebbles...you're not low enough.
     
  25. blown49
    Joined: Jul 25, 2004
    Posts: 2,212

    blown49
    Member Emeritus

    Squirrel,

    I measured my Merc with a cigarette pack and could slide an upright pack under the side pipes but not under the bottom of the caps. My Merc is dropped 5" front and back. If I go over most speed bumps I clear except for the bottom of the caps. Caps have about 1/4" scraped off of the bottom edges. :D
     
  26. flatheadpete
    Joined: Oct 29, 2003
    Posts: 10,634

    flatheadpete
    Member
    from Burton, MI

    My dailey driver '98 full size chevy had a 6-8 drop. Ran a little under 2" of ground clearance. The crossmember rubbed every once in a while but other than that, nothing else major ever hit the ground.
     
  27. Mr. Happy
    Joined: Aug 24, 2002
    Posts: 249

    Mr. Happy
    Member

    My 59 Ranchero is a little under 3".
    It scrapes things.
    Alot.
    I'm not changing a thing.
     
  28. hotrod54chevy
    Joined: Nov 7, 2003
    Posts: 1,590

    hotrod54chevy
    Member
    from Ohio

    aint that the truth...my car sits around 10 (?) inches in the front from the bottom of the bumper to the ground,but the BACK one sits somethin like 14,so it looks STUPID until i get some new springs or somethin...or just fill up the trunk with shit..i'm gonna be runnin a permanently lowered suspension in the back and as for the front i'm already running one...even though i dont care for the look,i think i'm gonna have to pick up a set of curb feelers,though...corners love me...as for scraping up the back end..well,that's why people started runnin skirts!
    creepy
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.