Register now to get rid of these ads!

Stromberg 48 vs 97

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by BanjoBoy, Dec 3, 2010.

  1. BanjoBoy
    Joined: Oct 2, 2005
    Posts: 570

    BanjoBoy
    Member

    Anyone know what the main difference is? Read the threads and seems the 48's get a little more cfm.
    Im running a Flatty with 4" Merc Crank (276cid) , Weiand Cheater Heads, Potvin 3/8 Cam,

    Any help is appreciated. All opinions welcome. Thanks guys
     
  2. hrm2k
    Joined: Oct 2, 2007
    Posts: 5,358

    hrm2k
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    48 = 180CFM
    97 = 155CFM

    We have several really knowledgeable guys on the board. You can direct your questions to UncleMax, Dickster27, Stromberg97.....I know there are others but just had a senior moment
     
    bikerlaw likes this.
  3. jetmek
    Joined: Jan 12, 2006
    Posts: 1,847

    jetmek
    Member

    my 276 runs best with 97"s and stock jetting. thaTS A 2X2 SET UP. 3x2 you mite get away with a 48 on the ctr carb
     
  4. 1952henry
    Joined: Jan 8, 2006
    Posts: 1,545

    1952henry
    Member

    Stock--.046 jets and #63 pv for a 48, .045 jets and #65 pv for a 97. 97s have two settings for the accelerator pump lever, unless they have been bastardized. Ford actually advertised the 97 as an "economy carburetor" when introduced in April of 1936.
     
  5. V8 Bob
    Joined: Feb 6, 2007
    Posts: 3,131

    V8 Bob
    ALLIANCE MEMBER


    All my info states the Stromberg 48 had stock #48 main jets, with 1 1/32" venturis, while as stated, the 97 uses #45 jets and has 31/32" venturis. Most agree the "48" name is from it's jet size, while the "97" comes from it's venturi size of .096875, or .097.
     
    joel and 31ster like this.
  6. uncle max
    Joined: Jan 19, 2006
    Posts: 908

    uncle max
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Actually, the 48, when first introduced, took it's name from the '34 Ford Parts numbering system, which all began with 48. 48-xxxx and so on. (jet size was coincidental).

    I sometimes build "hybrid" 48's... Using 97 style airhorns with the detent, and 97 style throttleshafts with two adjustment balls for easier tuning.
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2010
  7. V8 Bob
    Joined: Feb 6, 2007
    Posts: 3,131

    V8 Bob
    ALLIANCE MEMBER


    Hi Max,
    I don't remember ever seeing the reference to 1934 numbering system concerning the 48 carb, but it makes perfect sense! Thanks for the info. Just one more "myth" corrected! :)
     
  8. V4F
    Joined: Aug 8, 2008
    Posts: 4,391

    V4F
    Member
    from middle ca.

    if you have a 97 , i would try it first . 48s are the biggest . then 97 , then 81 . . steve
     
  9. strombergs97
    Joined: May 22, 2006
    Posts: 1,888

    strombergs97
    Member
    from California

    What intake are you using how many carbs. With the build of your engine, 3x2 would work great with three 81s and running non-progressive linkage..With a basic formula of 1.5 CFMs per CI your engine could handle 400 + CFMs..Three 81s is about 420 CFMs, sounds like a good match to me..
    Duane..
     
  10. BanjoBoy
    Joined: Oct 2, 2005
    Posts: 570

    BanjoBoy
    Member

    Running a Hexagon 2 x 2 Intake if it helps
     
  11. 1952henry
    Joined: Jan 8, 2006
    Posts: 1,545

    1952henry
    Member


    My mistake.
     
  12. model.A.keith
    Joined: Mar 19, 2007
    Posts: 6,279

    model.A.keith
    Member



    http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/group.php?groupid=269



    .
     
  13. strombergs97
    Joined: May 22, 2006
    Posts: 1,888

    strombergs97
    Member
    from California

    Hello..Run two 97s non-progressive. I believe two 48s would be better..
    Duane.
     
  14. BanjoBoy
    Joined: Oct 2, 2005
    Posts: 570

    BanjoBoy
    Member

    I was told to run 2 48s for the added cfm
    Using a hexagon 2 x 2 intake

     
  15. BanjoBoy
    Joined: Oct 2, 2005
    Posts: 570

    BanjoBoy
    Member

    thanks for all the input guys
    I was told the hexagon intake feeds cylinders in a different way than most flathead intakes. Just trying to turn stones and get some info.
    All info is appreciated
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.