Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Stromberg 97 accelerator pump delete

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by JCH, Aug 30, 2024.

  1. JCH
    Joined: Nov 26, 2013
    Posts: 67

    JCH
    Member
    from Upstate NY

    Anyone ever use these on secondary carbs?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. jaracer
    Joined: Oct 4, 2008
    Posts: 2,790

    jaracer
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Well when you open up secondary carbs, you momentarily create a large vacuum leak and it takes a second for the fuel to be pulled through the venturi. At that point you need a small shot of fuel to keep from having a flat spot. I wouldn't delete the accelerator pumps.

    By the way, I drove a 58 Impala with tri-power for about 7 years. It was my daily driver. I was young and couldn't help but open those secondary carbs. I had a home built mechanical linkage.
     
  3. JCH
    Joined: Nov 26, 2013
    Posts: 67

    JCH
    Member
    from Upstate NY

    They came highly recommended for my 6x2 intake. Guess we will see.
     
  4. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,889

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    Any factory 3x2 setups I know of still had accelerator pumps in the end carburetors.
     
  5. oj
    Joined: Jul 27, 2008
    Posts: 6,565

    oj
    Member

    What else did they 'recommend'?
     
  6. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,346

    sunbeam
    Member

    I had a tri power set up on a 400 pontiac that the end carbs had non working acc pumps and every time the end carbs opened it would go lean and pop back through the carbs.
     
    jaracer likes this.
  7. I would think you'd need the extra enrichment when the secondary carbs open up. You can always tune the secondary carbs by changing the position of the accelerator pump push rod (to the inner ball - which reduces the stroke and volume of fuel).

    Given that there accel pumps don't pump a huge amount of fuel (thinking modern Holley 4-barrel with dual accel pumps) - I can't see the additional fuel squirt hurting you at all.
     
  8. Also, there is another additional issue that you should consider:

    When you remove the accelerator pump mechanisms, you have also gotten rid of the full-throttle enrichment system - which uses a mechanical valve in the bottom of the fuel well that is opened when the accel pump push rod pushes against it. This could potentially cause a lean condition under full throttle - which is about the last place you'd want one!
     
    jet996 likes this.
  9. ‘28 RPU
    Joined: Feb 11, 2022
    Posts: 255

    ‘28 RPU

    I cannot imagine any scenario where removing the accelerator pump would be a good idea, none at all….. And as Bored says, that also eliminates the power valve which is a bad idea as well. If you are determined to do it I would up size the main jets a couple sizes which would help but would lower you miles per gallon (which is already going to be terrible with a tri-power. I would not waste my time even trying it and since you will be introducing a whole new set of variables as well (getting a tri power working properly is a PITA anyway).
     
  10. And if you did want to try it, don't remove the accel pump plunger - just remove the leather "cup" that plunges down and pushes the fuel out the tubes. That way, the plunger rod is still operational to actuate the power-valve - you just disabled the accel pump itself and not the power valve.

    I would not do it anyway . . . as I can see no advantage at all!
     
  11. JCH
    Joined: Nov 26, 2013
    Posts: 67

    JCH
    Member
    from Upstate NY

    This is on a six deuce set up
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.