i need a new carb on my 364ci nailhead im thinking about putting 3 strombergs 97s on it dose any one think that would be to much for a stock 364? thanks kevin
That Buick would handle everything three 97's could give it. Three 48's might be a better choice. . .
I'm running two 500cfm's AFB's on mine and it runs great. I'm pretty sure 1000cfm is a LOT more flow than three 97's.
I had 3 rochesters on my 364 and it ran great dont know what jets were in them you might want to think about using rochesters cheaper then 97's too or get 6-97's and a log manifold that looks the best I think but can be a ***** to tune good luck with your project Tom
I haven't run mine yet but I have 3 48's on a stock 401. I was concerned it might be a bit under carbed (and it probably is) but the carbs were built by Jere Jobe after much consultation and he ***ures me it will be good. I think he knows about carbs.
IMO you can run 3 97's with no issues. It won't be a ground pounder but will be easy to tune especially if you run all three with straight linkage. Might too, just be the ticket with today's fuel prices, eh?
I don't see where three 97s is to many CFMs???????Figure for street use 1.5 CFMs per CI..That's 546 CFMs for the 364..97s x 150= 450 CFMs..A little less is better then to much fuel..YOUR CHOICE,,I would use straight linkage and don't change a thing inside the 97, even leave your choke plates in.. Duane.
Nailheads like a lot of carb... ran a 750 on my old 364 and it ran a lot better than with the 600 before it. yeah yeah I hear all about 1.5cfm per CID but it's doesn't always work that way, to many other variables.
"A little less is better then to much fuel." Backwards: carbs too large = too much air, not enough fuel.