Register now to get rid of these ads!

strombergs on nailhead

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by hotrodthrills, Apr 14, 2008.

  1. hotrodthrills
    Joined: Jun 25, 2006
    Posts: 8

    hotrodthrills
    Member
    from nc

    i need a new carb on my 364ci nailhead im thinking about putting 3 strombergs 97s on it dose any one think that would be to much for a stock 364? thanks
    kevin
     
  2. chaddilac
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 14,072

    chaddilac
    Member

    if it is, you could probably jet them down.
     
  3. uncle max
    Joined: Jan 19, 2006
    Posts: 908

    uncle max
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    That Buick would handle everything three 97's could give it. Three 48's might be a better choice. . .
     
  4. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    Yeah, that's 100 cubes more than a stock flathead...and jetting ain't the answer to overcarbing.
     
  5. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,790

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC

    lmao.... 3 may not be enough....
     
  6. uncle max
    Joined: Jan 19, 2006
    Posts: 908

    uncle max
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Or, undercarbing. ;)
     
  7. TagMan
    Joined: Dec 12, 2002
    Posts: 6,364

    TagMan
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'm running two 500cfm's AFB's on mine and it runs great. I'm pretty sure 1000cfm is a LOT more flow than three 97's.
     
  8. donut29
    Joined: Mar 6, 2006
    Posts: 1,518

    donut29
    Member
    from canton MI

    I had 3 rochesters on my 364 and it ran great dont know what jets were in them

    you might want to think about using rochesters cheaper then 97's too

    or get 6-97's and a log manifold that looks the best I think but can be a ***** to tune


    good luck with your project


    Tom
     
  9. striper
    Joined: Mar 22, 2005
    Posts: 4,498

    striper
    Member

    I haven't run mine yet but I have 3 48's on a stock 401. I was concerned it might be a bit under carbed (and it probably is) but the carbs were built by Jere Jobe after much consultation and he ***ures me it will be good. I think he knows about carbs.
     
  10. dickster27
    Joined: Feb 28, 2004
    Posts: 3,212

    dickster27
    Member
    from Texas

    IMO you can run 3 97's with no issues. It won't be a ground pounder but will be easy to tune especially if you run all three with straight linkage. Might too, just be the ticket with today's fuel prices, eh?
     
  11. jfrolka
    Joined: Oct 4, 2007
    Posts: 898

    jfrolka
    Member

    stromberg 97's are around 200 cfm so go figure.
     
  12. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,982

    George
    Member

    97s are 150 CFM, so 3 is only 450. 4 would be just about right @ 600 CFM.
     
  13. strombergs97
    Joined: May 22, 2006
    Posts: 1,888

    strombergs97
    Member
    from California

    I don't see where three 97s is to many CFMs???????Figure for street use 1.5 CFMs per CI..That's 546 CFMs for the 364..97s x 150= 450 CFMs..A little less is better then to much fuel..YOUR CHOICE,,I would use straight linkage and don't change a thing inside the 97, even leave your choke plates in..
    Duane.
     
  14. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,790

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC

    Nailheads like a lot of carb... ran a 750 on my old 364 and it ran a lot better than with the 600 before it. yeah yeah I hear all about 1.5cfm per CID but it's doesn't always work that way, to many other variables.
     
  15. panic
    Joined: Jan 3, 2004
    Posts: 1,450

    panic

    "A little less is better then to much fuel."

    Backwards: carbs too large = too much air, not enough fuel.
     
  16. strombergs97
    Joined: May 22, 2006
    Posts: 1,888

    strombergs97
    Member
    from California

    OOPS..panic..right..opposite of my statement. Never want to run LEAN=HEAT..
    Duane.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.