Register now to get rid of these ads!

Structrural Channel for Frame?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by stratostreak, Sep 7, 2007.

  1. stratostreak
    Joined: Mar 1, 2007
    Posts: 20

    stratostreak
    Member
    from SW Ohio

    Anyone ever see structural channel used for chassis rails (ASTM A-36 for my fellow engineering weenies)? I know it is heavier than rectanglular tubing, but I think it would look kinda cool drilled with some lightening holes...
     
  2. Channel Iron- 4"x2 1/2" - 13.8 lbs per foot
    Rectangle tube - 4"x2"x 1/8" - 4.70 lbs per foot
    Nearly three times the weight. No thanks.
     
  3. stratostreak
    Joined: Mar 1, 2007
    Posts: 20

    stratostreak
    Member
    from SW Ohio

    The channel I'm considering at is much lighter:
    - 3" w/ 1.410" flange weighs 4.1 lbs/ft
    - 4" w/ 1.584" flange weighs 5.4 lbs/ft

    This is just a little heavier than the rectangular tubing you mention...

    Plus they use lots of the stuff at work so it's for me to get my hands on it!
     
  4. Unkl Ian
    Joined: Mar 29, 2001
    Posts: 13,509

    Unkl Ian

    Tubing is a lot stiffer than channel.
     
  5. Phil1934
    Joined: Jun 24, 2001
    Posts: 2,716

    Phil1934
    Member

    Channel and angle always look out of place. If I need a channel for an X member I get my local sheet metal shop to bend some. As for the frame, the torsional stiffness is much higher with a closed section, which is why channel frames get boxed. So if you can eliminate a step, do it. A look at crossmember vs. X member will show you that you must bend an X member in its stiffer direction to twist a frame while you need only twist a crossmember.
     
  6. Free is nice, but I only gave $102 for 40' of 2"x3".
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.