Register now to get rid of these ads!

swap out 55 buick front end for chevy

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 73super, Oct 11, 2010.

  1. 73super
    Joined: Dec 14, 2007
    Posts: 778

    73super
    Member

    Anybody know what chevy front end will work with a 55 Buick.

    Suppose I should measure the dang thing and start search.. but thought I'd do a quick check and see if anybody has swapped one out.


    thx.
     
  2. 42 chevy
    Joined: Nov 1, 2006
    Posts: 623

    42 chevy
    Member

    I am sure the Buick is a much bigger car than the Chevy. I just sold one and it makes my '57 Chevy look small.
     
  3. 73super
    Joined: Dec 14, 2007
    Posts: 778

    73super
    Member

    It's bigger, but the distance between the wheels is narrower.. obvious by all the "space" in the wheel wells.
     
  4. clarky1966
    Joined: Jan 29, 2010
    Posts: 97

    clarky1966
    Member

    I am using a 1989 caprice. Fits very nicely between the rails. I have seen others use a firebird/camaro. I am quite happy with mine though.
     
  5. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,783

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC

    I don't see the '55 Chevy frontend as an upgrade.
     
  6. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 10,704

    BJR
    Member

    I have seen early 60's Buick upper and lower A frames with ball joints and spindles and big brakes, bolted in place of the 54-56 Buick stock pieces. If I ever get another 54-56 Buick that's what I am going to try. The newer A frames are suppose to improve the ride, handling, and the front end geometry. Then grab the newer bigger sway bar too.
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2010
  7. 73super
    Joined: Dec 14, 2007
    Posts: 778

    73super
    Member

    I don't either.. wasn't the plan. A later model, yes.. not a '55.. the Buick is a '55.

    89 Caprice.. that may be a good option. Thanks!
     
  8. flatoz
    Joined: May 11, 2003
    Posts: 3,237

    flatoz
    Member

    the jag front ends have been used, gives you power rack steering which while I know nothing about rack steering, seems it makes getting headers or startermotors in easier.
     
  9. flynbrian48
    Joined: Mar 10, 2008
    Posts: 8,495

    flynbrian48
    Member

    I have Caprice Classic frame stubs, early 90's, under both my Pontiacs, a '48 'vert and '51 wagon. I like them, good brakes, steering and suspension geometry in one fell swoop. You can score a limited slip rear from the Caprice/Roadmaster wagons, lots have 'em, or limited slip and disk rear brakes from Impala SS. In this way you can use the Buick stock rims, or later 5 on 5 wheels. The track is a couple of inches wider than Malibu/Cutlass frames, so beware if you're planning on having it dropped on the ground.

    Brian
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Oct 12, 2010
  10. nali
    Joined: Sep 15, 2009
    Posts: 828

    nali
    Member

    I know a guy using a 2002 Ranger front on his 38 Buick . He said it fits perfectly .
    I suppose the 55 frame is about the same as the 38 , so this may work for you .
     
  11. Strange Agent
    Joined: Sep 29, 2008
    Posts: 2,879

    Strange Agent
    Member

    I doubt it, but I've been wrong before.
     
  12. flynbrian48
    Joined: Mar 10, 2008
    Posts: 8,495

    flynbrian48
    Member

    The track would be WAY too narrow for starters.
     
  13. nali
    Joined: Sep 15, 2009
    Posts: 828

    nali
    Member

    Well , he also swapped the STR 8 for a V8 , I don t remember which ..
    As a result , I bought the engine , trans , rear and front suspensions and the front of the original frame
    I ve been under his car , and I fits really well .
    The question is to know if 55 and 38 frames are the same ... It seems to me they didn t change for years since 1936 .
     
  14. missysdad1
    Joined: Dec 9, 2008
    Posts: 3,307

    missysdad1
    Member

    You're going to get all kinds of suggestions, 73super, most of which are firmly grounded in complete ignorance.

    It's always good to ask questions, but as with good lawyers, don't ever ask a question you don't already know the answer to.

    Do your own homework, like measuring the original track, front and rear, so that you can knowlegeably evaluate the suggestions that come in.

    Keep in mind also, that the smallest deviation in front track is going to give the car a whole different look, a look that you may not like. Most swapped front suspensions are too wide for the car they're swapped into, and using some kind of funky wheels won't fix it.

    If it's the same as the '55, your '56 Buick can tolerate 2" wider front track, 1" per side, but that's it. The rear axle can be a touch wider as well, but go too far and you'll be forced to use inset wheels.

    You've seen the setup under my '55 Buick 2-door, so you know what my suggestion would be for your car. Unless you need to go crazy low, my setup is as near perfect in terms of looks and driveability as I could imagine. Unlike the vast majority of people who make suggestions, I've got a ton of miles on mine already and it's absolutely great!

    And please don't get to cutting on your hardtop until you've got every detail worked out well in advance...and have run them by the HAMB to be sure you've made the right decisions.

    You've got a car that will be absolutely striking...if you do it right. Let me know if I can be of more help.

    :)
     
  15. 73super
    Joined: Dec 14, 2007
    Posts: 778

    73super
    Member

    I've officially decided to keep the original front end.. just rebuild and update.. cut the springs a bit. Rear is '78 El Camino. Now to figure out power plant. Nail head is long gone.
     
  16. Rusty O'Toole
    Joined: Sep 17, 2006
    Posts: 9,720

    Rusty O'Toole
    Member

    Good choice on the suspension. It's a lot easier to rebuild your old front end than change it. Don't forget to get an alignment done. If everything is working right they are a great front end, for ride and easy steering, not so much for race car handling lol.

    On the power train, there has been some discussion of this before. It seems the 61 and 62 Buick full size cars use the same rear axle as your car but with open driveshaft. If you can find the center section from one of those it bolts into your car. Then, you have to come up with some radius rods to take the place of the torque tube. 67-72 Chev and GMC 1/2 ton pickups and Suburbans with coil springs have suitable ones, or you can make something up.

    For engine and trans a Chev 350 and automatic will work about as well as anything.
     
  17. texasred
    Joined: Dec 3, 2008
    Posts: 1,219

    texasred
    Member
    from Houston

    A 350 chevy in a mid 50s buick is like a blow up sex doll, it may work but it ain't natural :eek:
     
  18. 29moonshine
    Joined: Dec 30, 2006
    Posts: 1,352

    29moonshine
    Member

    thanks now i have to clean the beer off my key board
     
  19. 73super
    Joined: Dec 14, 2007
    Posts: 778

    73super
    Member

    350 is always a fall back if I can't find anything else, but I'd like to hide something unexpected under the hood.. not so unexpected that if I ever wanted to sell the thing I couldn't.. I know there are purists out there and then there are those that say.. put whatever in there that makes you happy.. and that's most likely what I'm going to do.
     
  20. Why not attempt to keep it in the family? Look for a 350 or 455 Buick to put in it. You may even run across a good donor car with everything you need.

    Bob
     
  21. 73super
    Joined: Dec 14, 2007
    Posts: 778

    73super
    Member


    I may.. we'll have to see what the tides wash up on shore... :eek:
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.