Register now to get rid of these ads!

T-Bucket Makeover Project

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by nobux, Aug 9, 2006.

  1. LongT
    Joined: May 11, 2005
    Posts: 980

    LongT
    Member

    I have a 23 T kind of cookie cutter but it's what I have. I'd get a shimmy above about 60. But it would disappear. Most likely mine was from the rear bias-ply M/T's flat spotting when sitting in the garage for a week. I was told the M/T's tended to flat spot. I watched the tires while I was driving and 'believe' i noticed the flat spot, could have been in my head though.

    Also check the pinion angle and the trans angle, caster, wheel balance, alignment and tightness of front end components.

    Bill
     

    Attached Files:

  2. nobux
    Joined: Oct 19, 2002
    Posts: 647

    nobux
    Member

    Never did get rid of the shimmy. That's one of the reasons I changed the chassis. I always attributed the shimmy to either the 1/4 eliptic front suspension or the shocks that were mounted on the wishbones 8" back from the front axle. And it definitely was the front axle. I would watch the front tires start to bounce, and then "drum" from one side to the other. I had 7 degrees of caster and a half inch of toe in. I played with tire pressure to see if it changed anything. It didn't. Thanks guys.

    Oh, here's a pic of my original front suspension.

    [​IMG]

    I later swapped spindles and went with dropped steering arms to get Ackerman back, but it still didn't do anything.


    Karl
     
  3. buschandbusch
    Joined: Jan 11, 2006
    Posts: 1,293

    buschandbusch
    Member
    from Reno, NV

    suicide shimmy is the one constant among every t-bucket owner I've ever talked to :D It always happens at 50 regardless of front end, tire size, wheelbase, etc. OUrs is a short 95" wheelbase, suicide dropped axle, large radials on 15x7 wheels, it had shocks. We took the shocks off and removed leaves and it still had the shimmy, so, we lived with it
     
  4. LongT
    Joined: May 11, 2005
    Posts: 980

    LongT
    Member

    From what I was told the 5-7 caster is ok. But 1/8" toe in not 1/2". 1/8" toe in is what I'm running.
     
  5. nobux
    Joined: Oct 19, 2002
    Posts: 647

    nobux
    Member

    I was just thinking that as I typed my last reply. Every bucket owner I've talked to has asked me if mine shimmies too.
     
  6. nobux
    Joined: Oct 19, 2002
    Posts: 647

    nobux
    Member

    "From what I was told the 5-7 caster is ok. But 1/8" toe in not 1/2". 1/8" toe in is what I'm running."

    One afternoon, I took my car out of town on a straight road and played with toe-in. I tried 0, 1/8, 1/4,3/8,1/2, etc.. and it started jumping at the same speed every time. Belive me, I hated to take a running, driving car that I has just gotten done and start over. I tried evry thing I could think of.
     
  7. Guess mine is unique then! No shakes, no shimmies, one finger steering from stationary until the little 21 stud runs out of breath...
    Those wheels you had up front seem to have a whole load of offset - guess that wouldn't help?
     
  8. I'm with Monkeybiker on this one, none of my T's had any steering problems, bump steer, or shimmy, and they were driven on British roads which are renowned for being Shite. I did have a 32 3 window (pro built) which drove like CRAP - VW camper steering, magnum I beam, f*ur bar, first Rod I owned, had really bad bump steer

    Just because everyone else has problems - it doesn't mean that you should live with with it. I notice that you have the steering arms in front of the axle Which essentially means the axle is put into use 180 degrees out from how it was designed to be used. You'll never get the Ackerman right with this set-up. Take the spindles/Stubs off, change them from side to side, so the steering arms are behind the axle, sort the Ackerman out and you'll be getting closer to how it should be done. This is as per Henry Ford from 1929 - 1934 side steer, 1935 - 1948 cross steer.

    If you still have problems after doing the above - check the caster, camber, king pin inclination. As you have split bones - if the drag link isn't travelling in the same arc as the bones when you go over a bump/ hit a certain speed you are going to have problems. Check your "angle of the dangle" against the Pete & Jakes website - it gives you a good idea how the steering should be engineered.

    Good luck

    Bob
     
  9. Gotgas
    Joined: Jul 22, 2004
    Posts: 7,230

    Gotgas
    Member
    from DFW USA

    Good looking little T, that short wheelbase is MUCH better. Don't tell anybody, I generally don't like the long laid out look, especially on an A Tudor. But anyways. The Cragars are cool, you didn't need to get rid of the SBC, it looked great with the 2x4s, but the flathead is undeniably cool. Here it is with a truck bed, the tank you are running, and the sectioned grille shell.

    [​IMG]
     
  10. nobux
    Joined: Oct 19, 2002
    Posts: 647

    nobux
    Member

    Gotgas, thanks for the photoshop. The little longer box seems to work a little better than the-rodsters(thanks also). I printed off all three versions(deck, rpu, and nothing) and the rpu really seems to flow better than the other two. I'd been collecting flathead stuff for a while and decided that I'd never have a lighter car to put one in, so I replaced the SBC. I think also, that the Cragars are going to stay.


    BobbedT, I'm with you 100%. The car shouldn't have the handling problems it did. I DID swap spindles with dropped steering arms to get the tie rod behind the axle. There were a couple of things left to try, but they would have required enough rework to the frame that I thought it to be easier to build a new one. Now I have a CE 4" drop axle, spring over design F. suspension, cross steering, flattened front crossmember. Thanks guys,

    Karl
     
  11. InjectorTim
    Joined: Oct 2, 2003
    Posts: 2,241

    InjectorTim
    Member

    I'd keep the turtle deck, and maybe some redlin bias plies for the 60's look you want. But regardless, shortening it up is a 150% improvement, and the flatmotor looks good.
     
  12. nobux
    Joined: Oct 19, 2002
    Posts: 647

    nobux
    Member

    Well, a quick update. With winter coming soon, I've been busy trying to clean the garage enough to get the wife's car inside(women:rolleyes: ). I still managed to get a little work done on the car. I fabbed up a 36" pick-up bed, dropped the motor an inch and a half, mounted the 60 Chevy truck master, and a lot of other thing that escape my memory right now.

    [​IMG]
     
  13. fordman1
    Joined: Jan 11, 2008
    Posts: 394

    fordman1
    Member

    Looks great! I am thinking about switching over to a 26-27 body with a turtle deck due to my longer wheelbase, which is predicated on the fact that the torque tube is as short as it can get with the wishbones mounted to it. Otherwise we have pretty similar looking rides! Funny how Fargo and Mankato weren't that far apart either, until I drove mine to Portland of course.

    Great job on the improvements to your car.
     
  14. R Frederick
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 2,658

    R Frederick
    Member
    from illinois

    This thread is five years old. I wonder if his wife let him back in the garage long enough to finish it?
     
  15. swimeasy
    Joined: Oct 17, 2006
    Posts: 1,067

    swimeasy
    Member

    Hell, I can't even keep a wife for five years!
     
  16. n847
    Joined: Apr 22, 2010
    Posts: 2,724

    n847
    Member


    agreed pick up box!!!!!
     
  17. n847
    Joined: Apr 22, 2010
    Posts: 2,724

    n847
    Member

    Lookin awesome!!
     
  18. speedy383
    Joined: Oct 23, 2011
    Posts: 41

    speedy383
    Member

    way better with the short wheelbase.
     
  19. 23dragster
    Joined: Apr 22, 2011
    Posts: 264

    23dragster
    Member
    from U.S.

    I like the short wheelbase look much better.
     
  20. Hot Rod Elvis
    Joined: Jan 24, 2011
    Posts: 606

    Hot Rod Elvis
    Member

    In my opinion, I woulda left if a few inches longer, but you made a ton of improvement by putting in the flathead!
     
  21. Carm
    Joined: Nov 19, 2011
    Posts: 1

    Carm
    Member
    from Ny

    I am redoing my 23 I needed more room so I ordered a 8 inch longer bucket & a longer 20 inch bed so now I need to make the frame longer going to add coil over shocks a arm front end with a rack & pinion steering

    So now I had a 99 inch wheel base I'm thinking of going to 115 wheel base
    How do you think it will drive also adding a new LS3 fuel injection with over drive
     
  22. flatheadgary
    Joined: Jul 17, 2007
    Posts: 1,045

    flatheadgary
    Member
    from boron,ca

    hey, did you ever fix your shimmy problem? if you ever need to again, just put on a steering damper. a vw bus has a prefect one. i don't know why cars have it but, a steering damper will stop it. love the car with deck or box. oh yea, short version too.
     
  23. Flynn's_57
    Joined: May 10, 2002
    Posts: 949

    Flynn's_57
    Member
    from Nor*Cal

    Get redline (tires) for those cragars!!!
    That would be sooo cool! It'd totally work with the look you've got going!
    Hell, just paint a darn redline on the tire and TELL people they are redlines!

    And I'm likin' the truck bed, I think it looks more ... practical? Nifty? Neat-o? (cooler)
    Than the turtle-deck did.
     
  24. FoMoCoPower
    Joined: Feb 2, 2007
    Posts: 2,493

    FoMoCoPower
    Member

    am I the only one that noticed this thread is 5-years old?
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.