Register now to get rid of these ads!

T5 Remote Shifter

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Flat Ernie, Feb 25, 2013.

  1. I'll go one farther Alex, this would be a good way to run a T5 in something like my lakester with rear engine. You could actuate this setup with a rod or Morse cable thingymabob. Prob redundant but just thoughts in my head.
     
  2. metalshapes
    Joined: Nov 18, 2002
    Posts: 11,130

    metalshapes
    Member

    Yep.

    Absolutely...
     
  3. G9mickey
    Joined: Jun 7, 2005
    Posts: 248

    G9mickey
    Member

    I think the S10 T5's are not WC (world Class) that's why they are less preferred over the Mustang T5's. Also, the Mustang T5's can mount to Ford Bell housings without modification (I think) where the S10's require modifications to a ford bell housing.
     
  4. Flat Ernie
    Joined: Jun 5, 2002
    Posts: 8,406

    Flat Ernie
    Tech Editor

    S10 T5 prior to 93 are all NWC, 93 is a transition year, and 94 and later are all WC (with Ford bolt patterns).

    Mustangs T5 prior to 85 are NWC and all 85-up are WC.

    If you're referring to putting an S10 into an early Mustang, that only makes things worse as far as shifter position for the Mustang. Unlike hot rods who typically need a forward shifter position due to the original architecture and layout of the early toploader transmission.
     
  5. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,663

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

    This probably won't affect others but thought I'd mention it. My old 3 speed top loader was completely under the flat floor board, only requiring a hole big enough for the shifter. The S10 T5 is coming in quite a bit higher. Not only is the shifter plate above the floor, the top cover in front is an inch or better above the old flat floor. New floorboard time for me.
     
  6. modeleh
    Joined: Oct 29, 2009
    Posts: 380

    modeleh
    Member

    I am planning to put a T5 in a 64 Falcon. From what I understand, the Falcons need the shifter to be ahead of what the Mustangs need, therfore the need to put on a S10 tailshaft. Based on what Flat Ernie has said, would I be better off looking for a post 94 S10 T5, rather than finding a Mustang unit then having to swap tail housings? Would a 60s manual trans SBF bellhousing fit the post 94 S10 trans, or would I need to find a Mustang T5 bell?
     
  7. G9mickey
    Joined: Jun 7, 2005
    Posts: 248

    G9mickey
    Member

    Im thinking about putting a T5 in my 64 F100. I will probably use the 94 or later S10 as I think it will bolt up to my 223 inline 6. Does anyone know for sure?
     
  8. metalshapes
    Joined: Nov 18, 2002
    Posts: 11,130

    metalshapes
    Member

    I put about a '88 Mustang T5 in a '63 Falcon.
    ( bucket seats so no bench to get in the way )

    The shifter was right where I wanted it.
    But I had to do a lot of work to the tranny tunnel and the brace inside of it to get it to fit.

    And make an adapter to mate a early 5 bolt bell to the T5...
    ( I can post a pic of the adapter if you need it, I still have it )
     
  9. DD COOPMAN
    Joined: Jul 25, 2009
    Posts: 1,122

    DD COOPMAN
    Member


    Not that this often-overlooked piece will help everyone with shifter placement, but the fairly rare ASTRO van tail-housing actually places the shifter roughly a couple of inches behind S-10 position. DD
     

    Attached Files:

  10. modeleh
    Joined: Oct 29, 2009
    Posts: 380

    modeleh
    Member

    I would like to keep the bench seat as it has been reupholstered with NOS fabric from the guy in NW Washington. After doing a little more research, it seems the later S10 T5s run an electronic speedo, not sure what years there to avoid. The astro tailhousing is another option I hadn't heard of yet. So I presume it puts the shifter somewhere between the forward location S10 unit and the rear location Mustang unit?
     
  11. DD COOPMAN
    Joined: Jul 25, 2009
    Posts: 1,122

    DD COOPMAN
    Member

    Exactly! Mustang in THIS pic, for comparison. DD
     

    Attached Files:

  12. Flat Ernie
    Joined: Jun 5, 2002
    Posts: 8,406

    Flat Ernie
    Tech Editor

    I'm reasonably certain that the input shaft is all wrong to use the Ford bellhousing. The tranny will bolt up, but I think the input shaft is wrong...get in touch with Snarl, he's got the answer on this, I think.
    And you'll have an electronic speedo...which may/may not be a problem for you.

    Rare. I have been told, but never seen one in the flesh, that the Thunderbird T5 is a little bit forward of the Mustang - I think between Mustang and Astro. If looking at T-bird T5, look for one from a V6 Super Coupe. The Turbo Coupe was the 4-cyl and has a long, spindly input shaft that is unique to the 2.3 4cyl
     
  13. modeleh
    Joined: Oct 29, 2009
    Posts: 380

    modeleh
    Member

    ok thanks Ernie.
     
  14. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,663

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

    From the swap meet
     

    Attached Files:

  15. farmalldan
    Joined: Sep 4, 2009
    Posts: 141

    farmalldan
    Member
    from Duncan, OK

    Rare. I have been told, but never seen one in the flesh, that the Thunderbird T5 is a little bit forward of the Mustang - I think between Mustang and Astro. If looking at T-bird T5, look for one from a V6 Super Coupe. The Turbo Coupe was the 4-cyl and has a long, spindly input shaft that is unique to the 2.3 4cyl[/QUOTE]

    The Super Coupes use the Mazda M5R2 transmission. You're stuck with the Turbo Coupe T5 for a Thunderbird application.
    Farmalldan
     
  16. This is the transmission case I used in my '58 Apache. I took a Muncie Rock Crusher out of the truck and the Astro shifter location was a near perfect fit where the Muncie shifter came up through the floor. I notched the seat frame for the Muncie shifter similar to one I saw in an old T-bird before having the seat reupholstered. The T-5 has served well for the last 10 years but needs some work due to over aggresive shifting by my son.
     
  17. Flat Ernie
    Joined: Jun 5, 2002
    Posts: 8,406

    Flat Ernie
    Tech Editor

    Interesting. A quick google search confirms what you've stated. Another search for M5R2 shows that trans being used in late model F150 in both 2/4WD, Rangers, and only textual descriptions of the T-Bird.

    I've no reason to doubt you, and I'm not, just odd that there's so little info on it.

    Ashame it has an integral bellhousing as it appears to have multiple shifter locations available...I'm sure if you were determined enough, you could make one fit to many engines in a one-off fashion cutting/rewelding the bellhousing flange...
     
  18. Baddbilt
    Joined: Nov 17, 2012
    Posts: 2

    Baddbilt
    Member
    from Cali

    I had this shifter in my truck and it worked great. I blew the trans up and had it rebuilt with a different tailhousing so I have a restomod shifter for sale $120 shipped.
    [​IMG]
     
  19. spencer siebold
    Joined: Aug 8, 2014
    Posts: 1

    spencer siebold

    badbuild do you still have the shifter? im have been lookin for one. I can pay you $90.00
    if you still have it drop me a line please. superspencedog@gmail.com thanks!
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.