Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Tail Dragger 40 Mercury

Discussion in 'Traditional Customs' started by redoxide, Feb 29, 2016.

  1. redoxide
    Joined: Jul 7, 2002
    Posts: 773

    redoxide
    Member

    Bear in mind folks this is a rough old dog, its not getting any cash spent on it, well not much ...every piece of steel has been an offcut, some of the steel has been a touch tarnished with the rusty stick, but cleaned up OK . If 39/40 mercurys were not so rare as they are in the UK, maybe 5 or 6 at most ? and this one being the only one in Scotland, I really might have been better walking away... but a rough car is ripe for cutting up and a challenge just to save it from the crusher ... This was, believe it or not, a car that come from Kevan Sledge.. He rightly sent it to blighty where it was destined to become one with the soil... lol..
     
  2. Wow! You are one talented SOB!
     
  3. Crusty Chevy
    Joined: Aug 28, 2007
    Posts: 1,326

    Crusty Chevy
    Member

    When you build a floor from scratch do you just lay it directly on top of the frame rails or do you add the factory style pads or add them later?
     
    timmy2times likes this.
  4. redoxide
    Joined: Jul 7, 2002
    Posts: 773

    redoxide
    Member

    Im not speaking for everyone here , but for me I lay it ontop of the rails, especially on this one since its not meant to look factory its just a new floor to support the body.. so I don't think its that critical . When the body is finally mounted and bolted to the frame I will add some rubber under the mounts and that will stop rubbing and squeeking and will also help when gapping as the rubber will give a bit and pull the body a little during the tightening down process, so using Nylocks you can tweak a gap by nipping or loosening a body mount bolt ...and adding or taking away rubber strips. But again, having said that, given the condition of this body, Im not after perfect gaps, If it turns out that way then that would be a bonus, but just to save the poor old thing is the order of the day :)

    I would say though, that this ch***is has a fairly flat profile, If the ch***is had a dipp between the outer rails, and the centre crossmember was dipped, I would consider using something to lay into the dip so the entire surface area was more or less flat and supporting the floor ...

    This old girl had the remains of a floor so I would always take the best advantage of that. and salvage as much of the remains as possible and unpick any joins to break it down into manageable sections. I then lay the best sections with the most amount of detail to one side and will take patterns from those. There is usually just enough evidence of an edge in some places to give a rough idea of the outline ... Then when you really begin to struggle with how a part should fit in, take time out and search the NET, I've had a fair old amount of clues from other folks posts, saves a lot of head scratching.. That's why I post really, not to worried about the end results, just keen to help other folk so pics of the good and bad are always useful reference. :)

    Oh and don't throw out the rusty bits until your happy with the new stuff, I go back and forth checking out the rusty pieces quite often before they get s****ped..
     
    Last edited: Oct 28, 2016
    timmy2times and Crusty Chevy like this.
  5. Looks like you're progressing along very well. The side exit exhaust is a nice touch. May I suggest giving the body the Westergard treatment (I.e LaSalle grille, rear fender skirts,etc...)


    Sent from my iPhone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  6. redoxide
    Joined: Jul 7, 2002
    Posts: 773

    redoxide
    Member

    I have a la salle grille waiting for the job and it would just be rude not to put skirts on it. ;)
     
    koolkemp likes this.
  7. James D
    Joined: Feb 8, 2007
    Posts: 4,982

    James D
    Member

    Really impressed with what you´ve done!
     
    timmy2times likes this.
  8. redoxide
    Joined: Jul 7, 2002
    Posts: 773

    redoxide
    Member

    cheers James.. are you up for challenge to 3 window this ****er .... I have a plan to extend the rear deck, shorten the roof, and build in a larger radius around the back where the lower edge of the roof meets the deck panel above the trunk lid... I think that would loose the illusion of a hard edge down the rear roof section that's always fairly apparent on chopped mercurys.. especially from the front to rear 3/4 view....
     
    tomkelly88 and timmy2times like this.
  9. X38
    Joined: Feb 27, 2005
    Posts: 17,498

    X38
    Member

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Oct 28, 2016
    dana barlow and timmy2times like this.
  10. redoxide
    Joined: Jul 7, 2002
    Posts: 773

    redoxide
    Member

    There must be a secret ingredient in the matranga merc... its still the best example out there, many have tried but only a few have pulled it off.. they must have the original recipe..
     
    timmy2times likes this.
  11. James D
    Joined: Feb 8, 2007
    Posts: 4,982

    James D
    Member

    Sure, I´ll take a shot at it.
    You want to see something different to the Ida three window?
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2016
  12. ClayMart
    Joined: Oct 26, 2007
    Posts: 7,799

    ClayMart
    Member

    I think a few more of the people that take on this kind of project need to have this quote tattooed someplace where they'll see it frequently. ;)

    I don't see how this can't come out better than expected. :cool:
     
    redoxide, timmy2times and X38 like this.
  13. redoxide
    Joined: Jul 7, 2002
    Posts: 773

    redoxide
    Member

    Your a star James.. as you see the rework you did on the front is my avatar and inspiration.. If you can pull off something for the roof I would be really grateful... You will get the design credits :)

    The ida merc went a bit to far in the end , beautiful workmanship and definitely a custom but more akin to the creation of design houses and prestigious coachworks of the era... were looking at no funds and a built in a garden shed type build lol..

    Something different for sure , the roof doesn't have to flow into the rear deck with the rear window laying almost flat, it could easy be more upright but shorter with a longer/ deeper panel between the trunk and roof.. I cant draw a stick man , I can imagine what i'm after but creating that from mid air is a challenge.. If I can get something to work with, a good visual, I have a plan to lay hands on some polyurethane low density expanded foam blocks to fill the void from the B pillars back to the deck panel and carve it out to the shape I think looks good, then make the panels from there ..
     
  14. redoxide
    Joined: Jul 7, 2002
    Posts: 773

    redoxide
    Member

    spent a bit of time planishing out the door skin repair.. still needs a wee bit of work but its in the ball park.. :)

    IMG_1655.JPG IMG_1653.JPG IMG_1654.JPG IMG_1658.JPG IMG_1664.JPG IMG_1667.JPG IMG_1659.JPG
     
  15. X38
    Joined: Feb 27, 2005
    Posts: 17,498

    X38
    Member

    I hope so!
     
    redoxide likes this.
  16. redoxide
    Joined: Jul 7, 2002
    Posts: 773

    redoxide
    Member

    attached a few of my favourites... the ida merc is there, mid build where, for my personal taste, they should have gave it the nod as done ... Roof line looks pretty good from the angle of the picture ..
    The green merc is just gorgeous

    the red one, I really like the more upright style roof line and the defined line where it joins the rear deck.

    the bare metal car, same as above ...

    and the convertible ... perfect as it is but if I could get close to that shape in steel I would be a happy chappy... to my eye the deeper rear deck above the decklid just enhances the shape of the rear end ..

    DSC_0712PhatCaddy-vi.jpg 1104sr_35_z 1940_mercury_coupe ft_worth_top_100.JPG.jpg Ida39Merc37-vi (1).jpg 1940 Mercury 01 02r8.jpg 39 merc.JPG
     
  17. Kenneth31coupe
    Joined: Feb 24, 2010
    Posts: 670

    Kenneth31coupe
    Member
    from Sweden

    I really love the convert and if you can copie that shape over to metall ( and I think you can considering other jobs you´ve done ) it would be great. And maybe for rear window you could graft in a shopped 35-36 window to mimic the mailslot on the cab. It´s a tuff call to convert to 3window because the sailpanel often gets to big. I think by move the rear forward and extend the cat walk you´ll get better balance and proportions.
     
    X38 likes this.
  18. redoxide
    Joined: Jul 7, 2002
    Posts: 773

    redoxide
    Member

    Hi Kenneth, its the sail panel that I have the visual battle with, I keep calling it the rear roof quarter!! Because it has such a lot going on it can look like a straight line from certain angles...The rear deck ( cat walk ? ) definitely benefits from being extended. If you look close at the Ida " in progress" pic, there is a highlight on the lower edge of the
    sail panel that is almost telling them to extend the deck panel to that point and curve the roof around the back of the car from there...
     
  19. Asphalt Demon
    Joined: Jan 19, 2014
    Posts: 362

    Asphalt Demon
    Member
    from Australia

    Great job so far! Just thinking out loud.If i was to ever even consider converting one to a 3 window i,d consider lengthening the doors,to give the side profile of gl*** and roof a chance of better longer flow? Johnny
     
    X38 and redoxide like this.
  20. redoxide
    Joined: Jul 7, 2002
    Posts: 773

    redoxide
    Member

    Johnny, I wouldn't disagree with you .. It would be best to make the doors just a little longer, maybe I should have done that before I made the lower skin, the door still needs a little help so who knows !!! I have a lot of repairs to contend with and really wouldn't be a big issue to move the B post back at this stage ... There all worth thinking about, but I always hark back to my original build plan for it not to get to out of control ..

    I read somewhere that all 39 /40 mercurys were originally designed as convertibles, but due to some economic restrictions at the time, maybe WW2, only a few made it to become convertibles while the rest had the add on roof .
    I describe it as add on because it really looks that way, its a proper afterthought when you look close at how it was done . If you look at it like that, you could say the doors and rear quarter are the correct proportion, its the goofy roof that causes the problems..
     
    Asphalt Demon likes this.
  21. X38
    Joined: Feb 27, 2005
    Posts: 17,498

    X38
    Member

    Mmm, I'd like to see do***entation about that, and it surely does not include sedans as well?
    And the U.S. did not get into the war until late 1941 in any case, but which time the 42 models were already hitting the market.

    Edit: Sorry to sidetrack.
     
  22. redoxide
    Joined: Jul 7, 2002
    Posts: 773

    redoxide
    Member

    better not say all, delete that and insert coupes .. ;) they surely couldn't have designed it to look so ugly , something must have happened somewhere along the line ...
     
    slimcat7m3 likes this.
  23. X38
    Joined: Feb 27, 2005
    Posts: 17,498

    X38
    Member

    Maybe Edsel was being all European?
     
  24. Okie Pete
    Joined: Oct 29, 2008
    Posts: 6,127

    Okie Pete
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Amazing skills and patience .
     
  25. James D
    Joined: Feb 8, 2007
    Posts: 4,982

    James D
    Member

    [​IMG]

    I hope this is something like what you had in mind....sort of a chopped 36 3w style....
    [​IMG]
     
    timmy2times and Asphalt Demon like this.
  26. redoxide
    Joined: Jul 7, 2002
    Posts: 773

    redoxide
    Member

    only problem now is creating it :)
     
  27. CadMad
    Joined: Oct 20, 2012
    Posts: 886

    CadMad
    Member

    I think if you go 3 window then you need to lengthen the doors. It looks a bit stumpy otherwise.
     
    X38 likes this.
  28. Asphalt Demon
    Joined: Jan 19, 2014
    Posts: 362

    Asphalt Demon
    Member
    from Australia

    James D ,that looks pretty amazing.Maybe i am getting the wrong direction,but that would make an incredible removeable hardtop too.Redoxide just for our own curiosity and not to influence/confuse you but could we get james d to do a lengthened door rendering?perhaps three to four inches.then make the window shape more half teardropped or aerofoil like towards the rear.Like the green one and matranga merc Johnny
     
  29. K13
    Joined: May 29, 2006
    Posts: 9,730

    K13
    Member

    Agreed the proportions don't really work in that configuration. Too much catwalk.
     
  30. James D
    Joined: Feb 8, 2007
    Posts: 4,982

    James D
    Member

    Again, just for comparison...

    [​IMG]


    Too much catwalk...?

    [​IMG]

    Way too much catwalk...?

    [​IMG]

    ...too much... well...you might have a point with this one...

    [​IMG]

    If Redoxide wanted a 40 Merc like every other chopped one, i´m sure he´d build it. There´s more than one way to skin a cat.
     
    tomkelly88 likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.