Register now to get rid of these ads!

TECH: Ultimate T-5 Article

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Flat Ernie, Mar 25, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Deuce Lover
    Joined: Feb 15, 2009
    Posts: 1,175

    Deuce Lover
    Member

    You asked me this question and I can't give you an answer.Try asking Krylon32 - a member here.
     
  2. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,376

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yes.

    Take it apart, put it back together, with the different shaft. The gears go on it.

    Shim for zero-play.
     
  3. Got it, I have to pull it back out again to swap to the mechanical housing from the electric anyhow...... I was just on the McMaster website looking.
    Thanks.
     
  4. Falcon61wagon
    Joined: Mar 15, 2014
    Posts: 132

    Falcon61wagon
    Member
    from Indiana

    I have a 67 Mustang dual pattern 200 I6 and have some crazy notion that I would like to use a 9" clutch setup instead of an 8.5. Is there a bell housing that I can use to put a T5 behind my engine with a 9"clutch. Also is the early Econoline bellhousing the only bellhousing that will mate up with a s10 T5 Chevy bolt pattern. This is going under a 61 Falcon wagon so it would all have to fit as well.

    I can unbolt stuff but can't remember where it goes back...
     
  5. Deuce Lover
    Joined: Feb 15, 2009
    Posts: 1,175

    Deuce Lover
    Member

    Can't help you there.Start a new thread and ask that question
     
  6. Mike51Merc
    Joined: Dec 5, 2008
    Posts: 3,855

    Mike51Merc
    Member

    For what it's worth, I used Ford bellhousing #D20A 6394 AA which is not an Econoline bell, plus an adapter plate to mate with a Ford pattern T5. I'm unaware that there are any Ford bells with Chevy patterns, but I do know that late S10 transmissions (World Class electric speedometer units) had Ford bolt patterns. In any event you'll need an adapter to the older Ford (T10 and Toploader style) bells, not just for the bolt pattern, but because the T5 input shafts are longer.
     
  7. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 6,966

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    Chevy astro van used a GM bell housing, with the Ford t5 gearbox bolt pattern. Odd duck to say the least. 2012-12-06_15-23-18_305.jpg
     
  8. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 6,966

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    Is the 200 L6 the same bell bolt pattern as the 289, and 302? I have a bell from mid 80s mustang that had a t5.
     
  9. Falcon61wagon
    Joined: Mar 15, 2014
    Posts: 132

    Falcon61wagon
    Member
    from Indiana

    "Mate up" with an adapter plate.
     
  10. Mike51Merc
    Joined: Dec 5, 2008
    Posts: 3,855

    Mike51Merc
    Member

    Not so odd. All Chevys (and Pontiacs, etc.) with WC T5s have the Ford bolt pattern.
     
  11. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 6,966

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    But, the camaro and firebirds were tilted to the side, and the astro van allowed the shifter to be upright.
     
  12. Mike51Merc
    Joined: Dec 5, 2008
    Posts: 3,855

    Mike51Merc
    Member

    And the Astrovan T5 had a unique shift adapter that moved the shifter towards the driver side.
     
  13. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,376

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Only the very late ones. The early ones do not. They have their own pair of patterns.
     
  14. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,376

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The early Econoline bell has the Ford "narrow toploader" pattern on it.

    There is a common adapter that takes that to the GM/Muncie/Saginaw pattern. That adapter is 5/8" thick.

    The S10 T5 has an input shaft that is about 5/8" too long. Fold in that adapter, and this becomes a bolt-on.
    [​IMG]
    In hindsight, doing this conversion, I would have just turned down the T5 collar to take the Falcon throwout bearing.

    That's what I am did on Phase II. Seems to work a little better.

    These bellhousings are not hard to find, nor are the adapters.

    The trouble with going with something other than an S10 T5 is the gearset. Almost all other T5's have dramatically incorrect gear ratios for the engine, unless you also changed the rear end ratio.
     
  15. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,376

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The problem with the 9" clutch bellhousings is the depth. They are all much deeper than the 8-1/2" clutch bellhousings.

    This leaves no room for an adapter, to get the S10 T5 on to them.

    If you use a Mercedes pressure plate, there is no advantage to the 9" clutch.

    The Mercedes pressure plate should be good for 250hp, and a similar amount of torque.
     
  16. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 6,966

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    That's some good info there...
     
    Falcon61wagon likes this.
  17. Falcon61wagon
    Joined: Mar 15, 2014
    Posts: 132

    Falcon61wagon
    Member
    from Indiana

    "In hindsight, doing this conversion, I would have just turned down the T5 collar to take the Falcon throwout bearing.

    That's what I am did on Phase II. Seems to work a little better."

    I remember you saying somewhere on here that you built up teeth on the fork.
    What do you mean by turn down the collar?
     
  18. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,376

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    This is the input collar, it is where the throwout bearing rides:

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    In the lower picture, the dark grey area needs to be turned down on a lathe, to fit the stock Falcon bearing.
     
  19. Montana1
    Joined: Jan 1, 2015
    Posts: 2,130

    Montana1
    Member

    I have a '88 WC T-5 from a Camaro (#13-52-176) with a Chevy bolt pattern.
     
  20. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,376

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    GM went to the Ford bellhousing pattern 1993-end, on all T5's.

    I suspect that this was a vendor decision, as GM's use of the T5 was declining, and they wanted to trim the variants down to save money.
     
  21. Falcon61wagon
    Joined: Mar 15, 2014
    Posts: 132

    Falcon61wagon
    Member
    from Indiana

    Using the fork from the econoline bellhousing ?
     
  22. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,376

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    There appears to be only one 8-1/2" clutch fork. I used the one from my original bell, in the Econoline bell.

    Now, in Phase II, I am back to the stock bell, a turned down collar, and an unmodified fork.

    I will post pictures in the Doing Falcons Right thread, when I make some progress, besides machine shop work (as this is a T5 thread, and I'm not putting in a T5).

    I ripped up my shoulder, which has substantially slowed my work.
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2015
  23. Mike51Merc
    Joined: Dec 5, 2008
    Posts: 3,855

    Mike51Merc
    Member

    Sorry, my mistake. Seems the bolt pattern changed around 1993. I thought it coincided with the switch to WC in 1987-88.
     
    Montana1 likes this.
  24. 117harv
    Joined: Nov 12, 2009
    Posts: 6,586

    117harv
    Member

  25. Kiwi 4d
    Joined: Sep 16, 2006
    Posts: 3,792

    Kiwi 4d
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    What has happened to Flat Ernies T5 tech on page one? Is it my computer not reading it , as all I get are Font codes from half way down??
     
  26. David Gersic
    Joined: Feb 15, 2015
    Posts: 2,799

    David Gersic
    Member
    from DeKalb, IL

    It's not you. It's messed up.
     
  27. Kiwi 4d
    Joined: Sep 16, 2006
    Posts: 3,792

    Kiwi 4d
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Darn , this info is way too valuable to get messed up, Flat Ernies put too much effort into this to loose it.
     
  28. dirty old man
    Joined: Feb 2, 2008
    Posts: 8,910

    dirty old man
    Member Emeritus

    Another casualty of Ryan's "can't leave well enough alone" syndrome.
     
    wbrw32 likes this.
  29. David Gersic
    Joined: Feb 15, 2015
    Posts: 2,799

    David Gersic
    Member
    from DeKalb, IL

    It wouldn't be that hard to fix by somebody that can edit the message.
     
  30. Flat Ernie
    Joined: Jun 5, 2002
    Posts: 8,406

    Flat Ernie
    Tech Editor

    OK - I fixed some of it and even made a few minor updates. I will have to get to the pictures later as I don't have them on this computer. All of my T5 info is on another computer packed up and in storage. The original is also on the flathead techno site in pdf format:

    http://www.btc-bci.com/~billben/flathead.htm
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.