Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects The bucket of ugly! A de-uglifying thread...

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by need louvers ?, Aug 14, 2013.

  1. George,

    It was weird how un-advertised this event was this year. Not sure why that was. Even the NTBA and SOCAL T's who usually attend never got the info up. We sold my mother in laws place in Tucson, but I kind of wish we had kept it now. Hopefully Fred will accept my friend request and we'll be in the loop next year!

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  2. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Last edited: Nov 9, 2014
    need louvers ? likes this.
  3. AndersF
    Joined: Feb 16, 2013
    Posts: 943

    AndersF
    Member

  4. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    AndersF likes this.
  5. Kiwi Tinbender
    Joined: Feb 23, 2006
    Posts: 1,155

    Kiwi Tinbender
    Member

    Back to the top...Looks like we are toast...Page 12? Oh Well...I don`t have much to add. I was going to hitch a lift to Albany Swap with Tim, but it looks like I have to go to a Funeral. So much for an Uplifting post....
     
  6. Hackerbilt
    Joined: Aug 13, 2001
    Posts: 6,250

    Hackerbilt
    Member

    All the T bucket guys read this post so that means 98.7% of the HAMBers running Corvair steering boxes are right here too! :D
    Anyone know where you can get internals for those steering boxes? Specifically a pitman shaft bushing.
    I've noticed a bit of DW developing and along with a couple of Heim joints that need replacing, I see that the bushing is on the way out in the box as well. Shes a driver...gotta get her tightened up! ;)
     
  7. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,901

    need louvers ?
    Member

    Clark's Corvairs is the answer for Corvair box needs. You'll have to Google them, but they are somewhere in Masschut...Massachu... Oh to hell with it, Mass.! Just for laughs, ask for their catalog and price sheet - simply the most confusing thing that has even been put on paper! I'm a former parts guy, and until that there was never a parts catalog made that I couldn't wire in an hour. Impressively bad.

    One thing I found on mine, it has a tendency to back the locking ring off of the input shaft's bearing cover. You don't feel it right away as being worn out of squirrelly, but tighten it up and you'll immediately feel a major difference. When you put these things together, you are supposed to put just a touch of bearing pre-load on the worm shaft. I can't remember the actual inch pounds measurement, but I handled that with my huge Crescent wrench on the cover, tightening until the clearance in the bearings was gone plus a touch more. After that, lacking the proper spanner wench for the lock ring a small punch and a light hammer did the trick, and a small bit of "staking" has held the deal for a good long time now.

    Oh, and when I did my box, most of my rebuild stuff came from my local bearing warehouse here in town. About the only thing I got from Clark's was the sector shaft bushing.
     
    dana barlow likes this.
  8. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,901

    need louvers ?
    Member

    If you guys need a bit of 'Bucket pick me up, I had mine out to pretty damn near 100 tonight. Traffic moves on the 51 at about 80ish most times, even though it's marked at 65. As I got on tonight a bit after rush hour, a youngish sort in a Nissan sporty car thing came flashing past in the far left lane at a good 15-20 faster than the rest. With light traffic at that point, why not. Off to the far left H.O.V. lane, and seconds later I was right on his pace. Held it for a mile or two (oh, maybe a bit more...), then dropped back with the rest of the mortals.

    Damn thing gets better the faster you go! Felt very "glued in" up there at that speed, and the wind buffeting wasn't nearly as bad I thought it would be. Damned proud of this little thing!
     
  9. Hackerbilt
    Joined: Aug 13, 2001
    Posts: 6,250

    Hackerbilt
    Member

    Thanks, I'll check those guys out but I think I'll forego the catalog...I have enough trouble with Speedway! LoL
    My box seems tight other than the bit of rocking in the pitman arm shaft. but I will definately stake that adjuster once everything goes back together. Thanks for the heads up!
    I've had my Roadster up to about 70-75 but I'm getting a driveshaft harmonic at that point that makes it uncomfortable to go over that speed.
    I'm bumping the ratio up to at least 3.08 and maybe even into the 2's over the winter from 3.43 so the harmonic will move upward a bit on the speed chart...but I think I'll get the balance checked out anyway over the winter. It's really amazing how well these little missles work on the highway when the seating position is nice and low. Nimble and precise...just gotta love it!!! :D
     
  10. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Correct corvair turbo re-pops as well, just in case you are chasing a 100% period-correct '70's vibe...yea, I can dig it...
     
  11. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    I re-discovered a KILLER 70's t-bucket I had kinda forgot about last night in an old phr. This thing is a BEAST, kinda like sunkist but with the performance to back up the look, a real gonzo machine, no roll bar, vertical steering column and low nines @ 147 mph!! Sweet Jesus, too much for me!! I am still using my wife's ipad, once I get my computer back, I'll post it, as well as the R&C article on Marty's track T's.
     
    Tim_with_a_T and dana barlow like this.
  12. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,497

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    dana barlow likes this.
  13. VERY nice, Blue One! That's a really clean exhaust!

    George, which issue of PHR? I just got a shipment of 70's PHR's yesterday (mostly '70, 71, 72, and 73).

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  14. brad2v
    Joined: Jun 29, 2009
    Posts: 1,654

    brad2v
    Member

    Larry, that is super sano work. Looks good.
     
  15. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,901

    need louvers ?
    Member

    I thought more about this today, and I have to clarify this a bit. I mentioned checking the worm shaft cover yesterday, and the reason behind that was that is where I found my death wobble. If you remember back to the beginning of this thread, I went through a lot of "
    teething pains" with front end setup. One of those was a persistent death wobble a slow speeds. One of the many ways that can happen is if the pitman arm is loose. Thing is, there are 3 ways I can think of that pitman arm can get loose fore to aft.

    1.The sector shaft bushing wears out allows the sector shaft to wobble around and the pitman arm attached to do the same.

    2. The sector shaft adjustment nut can back off, or the sector or worm can have a worn spot that won't allow further adjustment.

    3. The worm or input shaft can kill a bearing OR have it's bearing race or cover back off and allow the input shaft to move back and forth, causing the pitman arm to do the same... Result, death wobble, sometimes at just any given speed.

    I didn't even think to check mine, 'cause I just been through the box with new bearings and such, and I am just stubborn enough to believe my work doesn't need "re-checking"... Well, guess what, sometimes I DO need to re-check stuff, and not as a last resort. Tightened it up, and suddenly all the bad stuff went away.
     
    volvobrynk likes this.
  16. Kiwi Tinbender
    Joined: Feb 23, 2006
    Posts: 1,155

    Kiwi Tinbender
    Member

    That`s good info on the Corvair Boxes. I looked at a car today that has one, as well as being rear engined...(Cerv 1 may ring a bell to someone...a friend of mine is building a clone, sort of....) but this is off the topic. Blue...that exhaust is really nicely done...
     
  17. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    February '76, blown bbc with Crane r285 :eek:, a tiny little pulley on top, t400, big race masters and an early olds rear with 5.13s! GADZOOKS! When I get my computer back, I'll post it. Verticle windshield posts too. What a beast...
     
  18. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Holy cow! I'd like to see that!
     
  19. Hackerbilt
    Joined: Aug 13, 2001
    Posts: 6,250

    Hackerbilt
    Member

    Definately good info and I do remember your bit of trouble with DW. My issue is pretty obvious in that I can see the shaft move fore and aft as the wheels are turned. Only a sloppy bushing will allow that...but I will for sure check the other stuff once the box is on the bench! Found the bushings at Clarkes and the price is reasonable. Thanks for the help!!! :D
     
  20. Tim_with_a_T
    Joined: Apr 30, 2011
    Posts: 1,655

    Tim_with_a_T
    Member

    Hey Kiwi Paul, sorry about the funeral. I don't know if I'll make it down to Albany, either. Been getting my rear end handed to me with the Camaro lol. It's really taking my T bucket therapy time away from me!
     
  21. Tim_with_a_T
    Joined: Apr 30, 2011
    Posts: 1,655

    Tim_with_a_T
    Member

    Larry, great work on your exhaust. It looks nice and tidy!
     
  22. Darn, don't have that one (yet!). Guess I'll just have to be patient like everybody else! ;-) Sounds like a pretty bad ass car though, kind of an old comp. eliminator car gone street legal! I gonba try to post a pick of the T my best friends older brother had right after we graduated high school. It's a scan of a one page feature in Hot Rod back in the 70's, not sure if it is going to be good enough quality to be clear on here though.
     
  23. Oop's, still having trouble attaching picd from my phone in the new format. Cars kinda off topic for our discussion, but it gives you a good idea of my formative influences.....
     

    Attached Files:

    volvobrynk likes this.
  24. steel rebel
    Joined: Jun 14, 2006
    Posts: 3,604

    steel rebel
    Member Emeritus

    Couldn't resist posting these two pictures from another thread. You've probably all seen them but it just shows how ugly not only T buckets but a lot of hot rods got in the late '60s and '70s. In defense of these guys this is what you had to do to win at car shows then. But then as I've said before everything was ugly then. Can't believe I ever wore red white and blue vertical striped Levi's. But I still love the "Super Bells" I wore. Still am amazed what good photos my new I phone takes. Guess I should learn to move pictures from one site to another. If that is even possible.

    Gary

    Oh sorry if anybody on the HAMB had anything to do with these two cars.

    IMG_0058.jpg IMG_0059.jpg
     
  25. Bailon's 'Wild Dream' and Stuckey's 'Lil Coffin'.... two rather iconic showcars from the early sixties. I don't know if I'd go so far as to say they're ugly (certainly not compared to some of the bubbletop monstrosities that were built) but they definitely were beyond the 'norm'. Both have aged rather well to my eye, although the fins on the Wild Dream do date it. The Wild Dream in particular is notable for the fact that it looks like it was a showcar that could actually function as a hot rod, not a common thing.

    But I also think Cushenberry's 'Matador' is the most beautiful '40 Ford ever built... LOL.
     
    dana barlow likes this.
  26. dana barlow
    Joined: May 30, 2006
    Posts: 5,362

    dana barlow
    Member
    from Miami Fla.
    1. Y-blocks

    I did an still do like "The little Coffin" n think it looks very cool mostly,but I thought the headlights would of been way better if they were on the sides of nose between top of coilsprinng and grill vs sticking up as they do always looked off to me. Making any type of fullcustom grill shell that looks good is super hard to do and most are very ugly fails for small out of place or size match things. I normely like stick-up headlights ,but the flow looked wrong to me from first time I saw it.
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2014
  27. fadt
    Joined: Oct 3, 2010
    Posts: 128

    fadt
    Member
    from England

    .
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2014
  28. steel rebel
    Joined: Jun 14, 2006
    Posts: 3,604

    steel rebel
    Member Emeritus

    You know guys this is a "TRADITIONAL" site and a traditional early '60s de-uglifing thread on that site. I'm sorry if you like those two build styles and rack and pinion steering but they are not traditional at all. Okay somebody might have built a rod in that style and used a rack and pinion steering but it is not traditional. Sorry Chip for my comments but other than maybe being quality builds they are traditionally ugly.
     
    daddio211 and whiplash1923T like this.
  29. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,497

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta


    My lord, there is a perfect example of ugly. The frame, the rack and vertical steering column on the wrong side :eek:
    I deleted the pictures from my reply to help reduce the ugly in the thread :D
     
    whiplash1923T and dana barlow like this.
  30. steel rebel
    Joined: Jun 14, 2006
    Posts: 3,604

    steel rebel
    Member Emeritus

    Wow Blue I thought I was really putting it out there.

    Come on guys this is a TRADITIONAL thread. Have I said TRADITIONAL enough.

    Oh yeah Blue I love your TRADITIONAL exhaust.
     
    dana barlow likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.