Register now to get rid of these ads!

The FED B.S. thread.

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by lippy, Feb 21, 2010.

  1. SinisterCustom
    Joined: Feb 18, 2004
    Posts: 8,277

    SinisterCustom
    Member

    I think it's a valid thread....I've asked on other FED threads questions on the gas rails of the early 60's (what was running during fuel ban) as well as what were the main differences in chassis', bodies, length's, etc between TF and Jr. Fuelers. Never got answers. A shorter WB rail (under 140") running gas or alcohol almost seems "doable" for a regular guy:), but seems to be little info....everyone is so wrapped up in Top Fuelers.....:D
     
  2. I'd say yes to needing this thread, but there is also lots of info on building an afordable FED over on this thread. ;) http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/showthread.php?t=430809
     
  3. SinisterCustom
    Joined: Feb 18, 2004
    Posts: 8,277

    SinisterCustom
    Member

    Thanks for that link......good stuff!

    This is exactly what I had in mind....killer car!

     
  4. 150J/F
    Joined: Jan 2, 2010
    Posts: 239

    150J/F
    Member

    I think that to get a certification to run quicker than 10.00 you must build the
    cage area (from the motorplate back) to the SFI spec and the slowest spec for
    FEDs is the 7.50. They allow many small differences but basically two types
    (transisition or double hoop) with either 5 or 6 point roll bars. They call out
    material size and thickness. All 4130 and all TIG welded. You can do pretty much
    anything you like from the motorplate forward. Min. WB around 100", max is 225"
    Front of car is up to the track tech. inspectors. Hope this is accurate.
    Mike
     
  5. k-88's have what I'm after. These were all stolen from the Chassis Research social group. Soon as I get the SFI specs I'll contact the local inspector with the question.
     

    Attached Files:

  6. voxnut
    Joined: Oct 30, 2008
    Posts: 286

    voxnut
    Member
    from sacramento

    We're at 133" wheelbase and will have an injected SBC. Basically what would have been a C/Dragster in the early 60's. I haven't updated it in a couple weeks (look for that to change!) but I have a blog about the build here:

    http://rocinanteridesagain.wordpress.com/

    We're mere mortals in terms of talent and experience, so the blog might appeal to someone going down this path for the first time as well...
     
  7. masracingtd1167
    Joined: Oct 20, 2009
    Posts: 100

    masracingtd1167
    Member
    from ct

  8. iagsxr
    Joined: Aug 26, 2008
    Posts: 297

    iagsxr
    Member

    Do you have any rear cage shots of the Chassis Research cars? I think the whole issue is going to be how you join the rear crossmember to the framerails.

    The way I read the rules it's that the lower framerail needs to be contiguous not that it has to be actually one piece of material. Obviously any joints need to be properly done. So the problem as I see it is what is the proper way to join 1.75" to 3" tube?

    As far as an X brace, that short wb w/3" framerails I can't see that it needs one structurally. If it has to be done as a rules satisfier have the back of the X line up with the radius rod mounts and use it to hold the fuel tank.
     
  9. bogart62
    Joined: Dec 20, 2006
    Posts: 199

    bogart62
    Member

    Interesting threads. Thanks for starting the group. Been acquiring parts etc. for a FED for some time now.
     
  10. Kerry
    Joined: May 16, 2001
    Posts: 5,155

    Kerry
    Member

    A lot depends on your NHRA Tech inspector. I've become friends with a guy who is also building a Dragmaster. He has the same saddle rear end mount as mine and his teched to 7.50. :-/ I think I'm going to contact NHRA tech in CA and see what they have to say about the continuous lower tube.
     
  11. pics of the back of a C.R., and then pics of modern "transition" and "hoop" anybody got a good shot of the back of a Dragmaster? Kerry?
     

    Attached Files:

  12. Kerry
    Joined: May 16, 2001
    Posts: 5,155

    Kerry
    Member

    OK, you asked for it. Here are some shot's of the original Dragmaster chassis's

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Here are some shots of a car that Dode Martin built and is currently legal. Jimmy Osborne drives it.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Here is a car that Jeff Degrandis is currently building that he got teched to 7.50

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    And here is what I put together.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  13. Thanks Kerry!

    those Dragmasters require a little studying to see where everything is going.

    gives me some ideas though.
     
  14. could some of you guys post "cockpit" shots, I'm getting to that point and I would like some ideas for layout, you know gauges switches pedals and the like. Pictures like this.
    [​IMG]
     
  15. buick320a
    Joined: Jan 21, 2006
    Posts: 449

    buick320a
    Member
    from indiana

    NHRA changed the rules in 1963........"all dragsters must have a sprung front end" that's when Scotty started adding springs to his TE 440.......plus it was at that time when he toured the U.S. or I should say the midwest and saw how bad the tracks were and changed his mind on unsprung front ends........so that is why there are not many unsprung cars left..........in order to run after '63 you had to spring your front end.

    Or just park it in the barn...............
     

    Attached Files:

  16. iagsxr
    Joined: Aug 26, 2008
    Posts: 297

    iagsxr
    Member

    So Kerry, was the dropout for the rear axle the only issue with your car?

    What did they use for an anti-rotation device?

    It's odd to me that the DeGrandis chassis seems to be lacking proper kidney bars, sympathetic inspector?
     
  17. bobw
    Joined: Mar 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,376

    bobw
    Member

    Rigid mounted front axles were permitted on gas dragsters, econo dragsters, altereds and nostalgia dragsters in 2008 with a wheelbase of 120" or more. That's the newest rulebook I have.
     
  18. Kerry
    Joined: May 16, 2001
    Posts: 5,155

    Kerry
    Member

    He didn't even look further than that. :-/ That's why I think I'm going to call up the NHRA guys in CA.

    The originals didn't have an anti rotation device that I know of. I made a plate that bolts to the pinion support on the top and a tube below it.

    Jeff went to the tech guys saying he wanted to build as close to the original Dragmaster as possible. The tech guys told him to add this and change that. He didmake it clear to them he didn't plan on running under 10's.
     
  19. SinisterCustom
    Joined: Feb 18, 2004
    Posts: 8,277

    SinisterCustom
    Member

    Damn yer car looks good Kerry....
     
  20. Kerry
    Joined: May 16, 2001
    Posts: 5,155

    Kerry
    Member

  21. Rand Man
    Joined: Aug 23, 2004
    Posts: 5,351

    Rand Man
    Member

    I'm still pluggin my new Slingshot racing series. Five races in Tulsa, Oklahoma this summer.

    HERE'S THE LATEST SCHEDULE:

    May 1st. -- FED/Alt #1
    June 5 -- FED/Alt #2
    July 10 -- FED/Alt #3
    August 14 -- FED/Alt #4
    Sept. 25 -- FED/Alt #5 (Nitro Nationals)
     
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2010
  22. I Love you car Kerry, I was stealing pix of the HAMB for ideas and yours was one of them. Good job! ;)
     
  23. Kerry
    Joined: May 16, 2001
    Posts: 5,155

    Kerry
    Member

    Thanks McTim!

    I tinkered on her some today. I got the neutral safety switch in the shifter and got it mounted up. I really haven't been happy with the way the cockpit fit. I moved the steering wheel up about 1 1/2 inches. I'm taking the guages out of the cockpit, not going to run a tach, and have the oil pressure guage on the engine. Really opens it up and makes steering a lot easier.

    I also got the shifter cable and linkage hooked up. Made a quick steel line to loop back at the trans since I'm not running a cooler. Mounted and hooked up the main battery connector to the starter. This is a quick disconnect for starting only. Oh yeah, I also made a gauge pod for the oil pressure guage to be mounted on the engine.

    I was thinking of pushing to get her started today on a 4 bbl to break in the cam but other things keep popping into my head like the cockpit. I should get her running this week.
     
  24. HemiRambler
    Joined: Aug 26, 2005
    Posts: 4,207

    HemiRambler
    Member

    Hey Kerry, Not to second guess any of your work, but might I suggest that you consider mounting the nuetral safety switch to the trans. I did as much with the thinking being that if anythign ever goes whacky with the shifter, linkage, cable, etc - none of that would interfere with the nuetral safety switch operating properly. Yeah - it's been said I overthink things....... anyways just thought I'd mention it.
     
  25. Kerry
    Joined: May 16, 2001
    Posts: 5,155

    Kerry
    Member

    Very good point. I'll give some thought as to how to mount a switch at the trans.
     
  26. HemiRambler
    Joined: Aug 26, 2005
    Posts: 4,207

    HemiRambler
    Member

    For the cockpit view request - here's mine - not a very good pic but you get the idea. I've changed it a little since this pic - I added a shift light - no tach.

    1. The KILL switch in the left disconnects the battry & kills the MAG --green LED indicates it's on
    2. The red FIRE knobs - 1 per bottle.
    3. The black START switch cranks the motor - since this pic I machined a little shroud for it so you can't ever hit it by accident.
    4. MAG KILL only kills the mag -useful for when you want to crank themotor over and NOT fire it up. Since this pic I added one of those red aircraft switch covers - makes it REAL easy to flip off.
    5. Shifter I made on the right (copied from a pic I saw)
    6. FUEL shutoff on the right.
    7. Parachute releases on the left - pull the FRONT one deploys BOTH chutes - pull the REAR one and deploy only 1 chute.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Mar 7, 2010
  27. HemiRambler
    Joined: Aug 26, 2005
    Posts: 4,207

    HemiRambler
    Member

    Hey Kerry, I was on the fence about the trans cooler - I'm sure I don't need one, but I figured it couldn't hurt. Here's a pic.
     

    Attached Files:

  28. H.G. Wells
    Joined: Mar 11, 2006
    Posts: 386

    H.G. Wells
    Member

    I will try to get some pics up, controll placement was a big question for me too. Every car I looked at was different so I just pieces together what felt right at the time. Mag kill switch on the butterfly, shift light on the manifold on the right side of the stacks, neutral safety on the trans. Shifter on the right side of the cage, fuel shut off on the pumpkin mounted to the fill cap, and parachute on the left side. Later when I added a battery the starter switch got mounted to the shifter and a master kill switch mounted on the fuel pump boss with a morse cable to the back of the car. You have to wire in a relay to kill the mag with a ground when you use that set up, painless makes a good one.
     
  29. [​IMG]
    some pix from Famoso yesterday
    [​IMG]
     
  30. lippy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2006
    Posts: 6,856

    lippy
    Member
    from Ks

    A lot of this does not apply to our car so I don't have much to post. We have no battery, no shutoff at the rear of the car, no trans cooler ect... I would not run a trans cooler for the simple reason if a leak developed you'd have a mess, it would be all over you and your face going down track and possibly under the tires. If your not sitting and stalling the converter I don't think the trans will get that hot. I would run a blanket on the trans also. Just because. These are just my thoughts and for entertainment purposes only. :D
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.