Register now to get rid of these ads!

The LS dilemma

Discussion in 'Off Topic Hot Rods & Customs' started by Roothawg, Jan 16, 2025.

Tags:
  1. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,798

    Roothawg
    Member

    Of course.
     
    twenty8 likes this.
  2. My daily for the last 6 years has been a 72 El Camino with a 5.3 and 4L60E. I changed to an LS2 cam and changed valve springs. It has headers and the Trailblazer intake. It was 315 hp to the wheels on a Mustang dyno. We stopped the pull at 5600 rpm because it was running out of fuel. Power was still climbing. It was a junkyard engine.
     
    A Boner, rod1, RodStRace and 2 others like this.
  3. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,798

    Roothawg
    Member

    Nice.

    This is a bone stock 99 5.7 LS1. I figure I will clean up the heads and change the seals, have them check it to make sure they are true and change the springs. Use the 5.3 short block.

    I am going to retain the original Camaro intake and throttle. I'll probably put a set of long tube headers on it, if they will fit, change the cam to a mild street/tow type of cam and call it good. I'll try and make it as sanitary as possible, but I am not spending a ton of time or money trying to make it look like a gen 1 sbc. But, I do think I will put a Ford emblem on the intake just to piss off the purists.

    300 HP is plenty for me on this truck. If I end up with more, it's all gravy.
     
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2025
  4. What I really like is that it leaks nothing. I park anywhere and there are no spots of anything.

    I do have the headers from Holley made for the A body. The engine had 45k on it. The trans was from a Camaro and had been rebuilt. For engine management I am running a Megasquirt MS3 and controlling the transmission with a Microsquirt. It is nice to be able to program the shift pattern.
     
    RMcCulley, AmishMike and squirrel like this.
  5. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 21,614

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Considering your intended purpose I would choose your components to be geared toward torque.
     
    tractorguy and Roothawg like this.
  6. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,236

    squirrel
    Member

    The stock setup is geared towards torque, but it has a nice wide torque curve. Like idle to 5000 or something.
     
  7. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,798

    Roothawg
    Member

    There are quite a few towing cams available. Tons of info on the old web. I will run the factory ECU and probably a stand alone computer of I use an automatic. I am leaning towards a 5 speed stick, just to minimize the extra crap for tranny coolers etc. Plus, I prefer controlling my shift point, especially when towing.
     
    Okie Pete likes this.
  8. TexasHardcore
    Joined: May 30, 2003
    Posts: 5,556

    TexasHardcore
    Member
    from Austin-ish

    The stock LS ECU (if from an automatic vehicle) will control a 4L60E/4L80E with no other stuff needed, and you can customize all tranmission operations in the ECU with HP Tuners, FYI.
     
    ffr1222k, Roothawg and RodStRace like this.
  9. jimpopper
    Joined: Feb 3, 2013
    Posts: 376

    jimpopper
    Member

    Funny how an aluminum blocked V8 in the 70’s would have been worth spending a fortune repairing but today they are throw away. SMH.
     
    rod1 and SS327 like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.