Register now to get rid of these ads!

The LS dilemma

Discussion in 'Off Topic Hot Rods & Customs' started by Roothawg, Jan 16, 2025.

Tags:
  1. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,499

    Roothawg
    Member

    Of course.
     
    twenty8 likes this.
  2. My daily for the last 6 years has been a 72 El Camino with a 5.3 and 4L60E. I changed to an LS2 cam and changed valve springs. It has headers and the Trailblazer intake. It was 315 hp to the wheels on a Mustang dyno. We stopped the pull at 5600 rpm because it was running out of fuel. Power was still climbing. It was a junkyard engine.
     
    A Boner, rod1, RodStRace and 2 others like this.
  3. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,499

    Roothawg
    Member

    Nice.

    This is a bone stock 99 5.7 LS1. I figure I will clean up the heads and change the seals, have them check it to make sure they are true and change the springs. Use the 5.3 short block.

    I am going to retain the original Camaro intake and throttle. I'll probably put a set of long tube headers on it, if they will fit, change the cam to a mild street/tow type of cam and call it good. I'll try and make it as sanitary as possible, but I am not spending a ton of time or money trying to make it look like a gen 1 sbc. But, I do think I will put a Ford emblem on the intake just to piss off the purists.

    300 HP is plenty for me on this truck. If I end up with more, it's all gravy.
     
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2025
  4. What I really like is that it leaks nothing. I park anywhere and there are no spots of anything.

    I do have the headers from Holley made for the A body. The engine had 45k on it. The trans was from a Camaro and had been rebuilt. For engine management I am running a Megasquirt MS3 and controlling the transmission with a Microsquirt. It is nice to be able to program the shift pattern.
     
    RMcCulley, AmishMike and squirrel like this.
  5. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 20,599

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Considering your intended purpose I would choose your components to be geared toward torque.
     
    tractorguy and Roothawg like this.
  6. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,971

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The stock setup is geared towards torque, but it has a nice wide torque curve. Like idle to 5000 or something.
     
  7. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,499

    Roothawg
    Member

    There are quite a few towing cams available. Tons of info on the old web. I will run the factory ECU and probably a stand alone computer of I use an automatic. I am leaning towards a 5 speed stick, just to minimize the extra crap for tranny coolers etc. Plus, I prefer controlling my shift point, especially when towing.
     
    Okie Pete likes this.
  8. TexasHardcore
    Joined: May 30, 2003
    Posts: 5,362

    TexasHardcore
    Member
    from Austin-ish

    The stock LS ECU (if from an automatic vehicle) will control a 4L60E/4L80E with no other stuff needed, and you can customize all tranmission operations in the ECU with HP Tuners, FYI.
     
    Roothawg and RodStRace like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.