yes Dicks story would definitely be a good one. Altho built in the 50,s those guys built very good traditional rods. In 56 I bought a little 53 Dodge hemi, to put in a 40 Ford, but being a 16 yr old I didnt have the knowledge to stuff it in that car. Traded it back and bought something very new at the time ,[265" Chevy.] They said it would fit real good.
Before everyone gets too busy "helping" Coonan pick cars for TRJ ... don't forget to devote some assistance to a couple of other magazines who need your help much more! Hot Rod magazine emblazoned the cover of their rag with a caption that read, "Built -- Not Bought" ... and then featured a car that had been bought in the related article. R&C featured a car -- on both the cover and in an article -- that had not undergone a single change since purchase by the new owner, by his own admission. It had simply been bought. Don't get me wrong -- I'm not ranting against the cars themselves; both were really nice. I'm talking about an editorial philosphy that rewards people -- via recognition in national publications -- for having nothing more than deep pockets. Jeeeez!
I only purchase very occasional copies of TRJ so I can't really comment but I'd like to know more about this car. I 'm certain that I'm not the only one here that enjoys looking at detailed build ups and bare metal workmanship as much as viewing the finished car, the build up some how gives "added value" to the car and article.
Thank you gentlemen for the pick. Here's a photoshop done by Rikster of how the car will look (hopefully) next year. Now all I have to do is wait for TRJ to call me.
Yeah, but I want to see that Mr. Smith's killer hot rod was built by Mr. Quinn. Just a "credit where credit is due" thing, ya know? It bothers me when a "buyers" car is featured and the owner gives no credit to those talented builders. Nothing wrong with a checkbook rodder who respects the talent and hard work of those who made the car what it is.
I didn't have the skill either... I submitted my car for an event that featured "vintage hot rods" which I recieved a quick reply - no thanks... learned later it wasn't considered because it had a Chevy motor... a few weeks later I was invited... the guest - Ken Gross, informed them that a 57 Vette motor backed by a 39 toploader & banjo rear was a vintage hot rod... go figure
Got my #53 at So-Cal Phoenix on Saturday... Pretty damn good! Too much custom stuff though (Heh heh!). I do have to admit that with the larger format of the mag over the last couple of years, it is easier to stomach the increase in custom coverage. The Sta-Lube article was the first thing I read... How cool is that? the Miller steamliner, the two deuces, spence's story, the '36 tub and deuce racer, and the Willys... Cool! The rest? Filler!
Sorry sir... I did read the article on your car, and I certainly respect the amount of work, inginuity, effort and time involved, and always will. But I just can't "get" customs... I swear I have tried. To call your car "filler" is an insult, I know, I mean no ill will it's just not my interest.
HAHAHA ya Filler what a joke! ....I love Kustoms....to me Hotrods are just big model kits...they get boring to look at! its like looking at a skinny tweaker or a big breasted curvy women!
After reading this entire thread, one obvious oversight has to be addressed- Do you guys realize that for every car featured, many, many more have to be cut from the issues because EVERY page of editorial has to be supported by advertising to pay the bills? Yeah! That old evil advertising. No ads, no cars - period. TRJ has the lowest ratio of advertising per issue of any hot rodding magazine, but that fact remains that subscriptions and news stand sales do not come close to covering the costs of producing this great treasure each year. So if you want more of whatever floats your boat, tell the advertisers that you appreciate their support and heck, you might even buy something from them while you're at it. Steve struggles with every issue about what to keep in and what has to be sacrificed because of page cost limitations. He could easily double the size of any issue with cool stuff he already has ready to go. So encourage your favorite parts manufacturers and shops to support the magazine with advertising and then you can see more of the unmatched photography and editorial quality you've enjoyed since issue number one! No I am not affiliated with TRJ, but I have been an advertiser since issue one!
OK guy's I understand all the rant & rave about deep pockets & customs. But to me it is all about the cars and the guys that built them for us to like or not. I go back to issue #6 and am still getting it. As far as me I think it is the top dog in the business. Keep it going Steve....
As for the Gypsy Rose I believe it to truly be a legend. Especially if you're from SoCal, aquainted with the Imperials or were around the Lowrider scene at the time ( I was not but was educated young by my Dad who was). However... the only problem I see with that is this causing a blur in the line of "Rodder/Custom/Lowrider". It was even mentioned in TRJ# 47 how Richie Valles' 59 El Camino "could fall into either camp," due to it's Astro Supremes and narrow whitewalls. But...The Gypsy Rose is not only a lowrider but it's a pure-bred lowriding legend and icon of classic lowriding. Not quite a nomination for possible "Rodder". This whole thing isnt to argue with you but then we blur the line and next thing we know we have Kid Rock style 73 Trans Ams and Vans from the 70's (which I fear ARE making a comeback). If this is the case then why dont we throw in 11 second Volkswagens too? I love Volkswagens but I dont spend 15 damn dollars for my flat-four fix. Just my two cents.
FritzTownFord I easily could be mistaken but I find it very hard to believe TRJ has a shortage of venders wanting to advertise in it.
My main complaint with TRJ is that the newest issue is in the stores now, but I won't get mine in the mail for another month. I live 60 miles from the nearest book store or I wouldn't have a subscription.
The term "custom" covers a broad range of styles ranging from the Calori Coupe, to the Hirohata Merc, to the DeRosa Shark (ugh). Lowriders are just another form of "custom".
You are very right on that. The term custom gets thrown around on cars that are just lowered. To me that is not a custom. I have seen and sure most here have seen people throw that word in there thread or when there trying to sell a car.
Not at all bitching!!! Love the mag!!! 1. Bass' hemi coupe. 2. Cody's 59 wagon 3. Bass' Wade coupe 4. Would mind a series on fleetline customs. 5. Littleman's truck.
guys on the HAMB cant even agree on a truly great periodical like the Rodders Journal..... sheesh I strongly urge anyone to try and publish a magazine. dont just sit at your computer and talk smack.... do something about it. even if it is an online mag - DO IT!!!! see just how "easy" it is..... if you are just gonna complain - then what are you contributing?
This is a great list, it just needs the farmer12 Plymouth coupe and the Grits model a and it would be perfect!
Back to the original intent. Here is what I want to see! Don't know who it belongs to, but it stopped me in my tracks cold at LARS this summer! Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please!!!
My only problem is i can't get to my local hotrod parts store untill tomorrow to pick it up. They called to say it's in. I have them all and love them all.
When BICKFORD started this thread he was asking people to post cars that we felt deserved the recognition, he wasn't asking anyone to disrespect or insult any cars. If you don't "get" customs, then why did you feel it necessary too insult me and the others in the issue by calling our cars "filler"? When someone posted about people paying to have their cars built, you respond by saying "Got no problem with those folks... They keep me in businesss!". You're quite the business man...I guess you don't want do do any louvers or what ever you do on customs??? PS: I build hot rods also, maybe one of those will be filler some day too...I can only hope!!
The Jalopy Journal
