Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical throw out bearing

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by in the weeds, Nov 12, 2013.

  1. in the weeds
    Joined: Mar 7, 2009
    Posts: 100

    in the weeds
    Member
    from Kansas

    wondering if any one has used a hydraulic throw out bearing in a 1939 ford 3 speed transmission. Seems the simplest solution wondering if anyone has done it or a thread on it.
     
  2. Gene Boul
    Joined: Feb 9, 2006
    Posts: 805

    Gene Boul

    WHY?
    You would be adding extra bells and whistles for no purpose.
     
  3. Bluedot
    Joined: Oct 26, 2011
    Posts: 333

    Bluedot
    Member

    I used a hydraulic TO brg on my car (not a flathead) only because I had no room for mechanical linkage. To me, 1st choice is pure mechanical, 2nd choice if must hydraulic would be a slave cylinder working the fork. Last choice would be the hydraulic bearing. Why? Most trouble prone (not always, but it happens), no adjustment (I'm a control freak), most expensive ($125 min, prolly more for a better brand).
    If you go that way, follow the mfr's measuring instructions very carefully before ordering. The first one I bought was too long, had to exchange for a shorter one. (Too short can be shimmed. Too long makes for some further work or problems.)
     
  4. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,247

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    X2..AND to change you have to separate engine and trans; do that once [like on a ot 92 Ford pick up] and you will have deeper thoughts about the "trick" TOB...
     
  5. in the weeds
    Joined: Mar 7, 2009
    Posts: 100

    in the weeds
    Member
    from Kansas

    tried the slave cylinder idea and it will not budge the fork arm. you could push with both feet and still nothing
     
  6. Jimmy2car
    Joined: Nov 26, 2003
    Posts: 1,707

    Jimmy2car
    Member
    from No. Cal

    "tried the slave cylinder idea and it will not budge the fork arm. you could push with both feet and still nothing"

    I think you may have other problems
     
  7. HellsHotRods
    Joined: Jul 24, 2009
    Posts: 1,443

    HellsHotRods
    Member


    I feel the same way. WHY ??? Leave it alone, the standard OE work fine, even at Bonneville.
     
  8. the-stig
    Joined: Jun 24, 2010
    Posts: 1,531

    the-stig
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Did it on my 56 Fairlane with a 302/5 speed. Just over 1,000 trouble free miles.
     
  9. 40FordGuy
    Joined: Mar 24, 2008
    Posts: 2,907

    40FordGuy
    Member

    What "seb" said... Go with an external setup for ease of access and adjustment.

    4TTRUK
     
  10. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 36,222

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Same as Jimmy2car I would be led to believe that you have other problems not related to the hydraulic clutch setup.

    The onlything I can think of on the master cylinder /slave cylinder setup is that they may be miss matched and the master cylinder doesn't have enough poop to push the clutch in. Such as using a small car master cylinder/slave cylinder setup off a little four banger car that has a very light clutch to begin with.

    For the past 40+ years guys have used the mid 60's Chevy/GMC hydraulic clutch master and slave cylinder combo with little or no problems as those are designed for some serious clutches.
     
  11. 29AVEE8
    Joined: Jun 28, 2008
    Posts: 1,384

    29AVEE8
    Member

    Do you have a picture of your set up?
     
  12. chickenridgerods
    Joined: Jul 22, 2003
    Posts: 1,561

    chickenridgerods
    Member
    from DSM, IA

    You need to diagnose the issue you're having before you jump to the conclusion that you need a hydraulic throwout bearing.

    Pull the transmission out of the car and check the throwout arm, throwout bearing, pressure plate, etc.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.