Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical timing chain oil Slinger sbc.

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by joel, Jan 18, 2015.

  1. joel
    Joined: Oct 10, 2009
    Posts: 2,724

    joel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    This should be easy, but I can't find it. When did they stop using the concave disk (oil slinger) between the crank timing gear and the harmonic balancer? Do I need one?
    I pulled a spare 350 ( 1974 police, auto, 4bbl ) apart and it didn't have one. I am working on a late 60 s lg journal 327.
     
  2. Russco
    Joined: Nov 27, 2005
    Posts: 4,397

    Russco
    Member
    from Central IL

    I'm not sure when they did away with them, but the last 2 motors I built didn't use them either. I think they were more to deflect oil away from the front seal than to sling oil for lubrication purposes.
     
  3. joel
    Joined: Oct 10, 2009
    Posts: 2,724

    joel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Thanks for the quick response; I'm really trying to get this thing finished up.
     
  4. landseaandair
    Joined: Feb 23, 2009
    Posts: 4,485

    landseaandair
    Member
    from phoenix

    I've never personally seen one in the boatload of SBCs I've had apart. From what I heard though they were used from the 50s to the very early 60s.
     
  5. Don West
    Joined: May 18, 2014
    Posts: 140

    Don West

    never seen one on a sbc but AMC 290-401 v-8's use them.
     
  6. joel
    Joined: Oct 10, 2009
    Posts: 2,724

    joel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Thanks, that's 3 for 3, so I'm going without it. Might have been in the earlier small journal engines.
    I haven't seen one of those in a while.
     
  7. 26 T Ford RPU
    Joined: Jun 9, 2012
    Posts: 12,568

    26 T Ford RPU
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I can back that up with I've never seen one in any of the three hundred and sixty SBC's I have built. JW
     
  8. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,501

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The last ones I saw were on 327's. By the advent of the 350, it appears that they were gone.
     
  9. Tony
    Joined: Dec 3, 2002
    Posts: 7,351

    Tony
    Member

    I've never seen one either and the bulk of the sbc's i've build have been in the 58-66 years.

    Tony
     
  10. belair
    Joined: Jul 10, 2006
    Posts: 9,036

    belair
    Member

    Yep -never seen one.
     
  11. stimpy
    Joined: Apr 16, 2006
    Posts: 3,546

    stimpy

    never seen one on a sbc or a BBC , they probably got rid of them when seal technology got better and with the use of PCv systems as there was a lower crankcase pressure
     
  12. 3wLarry
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 12,804

    3wLarry
    Member Emeritus
    from Owasso, Ok

    anyone got a pic of one?
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  13. I think it's kinda like Bigfoot.
    Rumor has it the very early engines had them and they were to sling the oil away from the seal.

    image.jpg
     
  14. joel
    Joined: Oct 10, 2009
    Posts: 2,724

    joel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    That's what I remember, the one on the left. I'm onward and upward now; thanks to everyone for their replies.
     
  15. That's because they really didn't do anything but cost money and time on the****embly line. If I had a mill that had one when I pulled it down I would put it back and if I didn't I would forget about it.
     
  16. brigrat
    Joined: Nov 9, 2007
    Posts: 6,056

    brigrat
    Member
    from Wa.St.

  17. Russco
    Joined: Nov 27, 2005
    Posts: 4,397

    Russco
    Member
    from Central IL

    When I was right out of high school. I tore core motors down for a machine/race engine shop. I couldn't swear to it but I thought some of the early 327's still had them.
     
  18. They didn't lose 'em until they went large journal.
     
  19. OLDSMAN
    Joined: Jul 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,422

    OLDSMAN
    BANNED

    I have never seen one in a small block either. Most engines thar I have seen with a slinger were ones with a rope frontseal, not a neoprene seal like SBC use
     
  20. brigrat
    Joined: Nov 9, 2007
    Posts: 6,056

    brigrat
    Member
    from Wa.St.

    They aren't thick BUT if your***** about "things" you would think that without it the crank stub/balancer would be that much more inward moving your lower pulley inwards also. Maybe there's 2 diff. length stubs, one for with and for without?
     
  21. I had one on my 1957 283 283 HP and my smaller 283 220 HP engine.
    The one on my low horse engine gave me fits on low temperature days.
    Squealed like a cat in heat, only when very cold.
    Took it out and threw it in the barrel.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.