Register now to get rid of these ads!

Turbo Stovebolt?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Moloko, Jan 25, 2006.

  1. Stone
    Joined: Nov 24, 2003
    Posts: 2,279

    Stone
    Member

    Not that it matters. I know superchargers, but are turbos traditional? I guess a better question would be when were turbos first used?
     
  2. Gemini EFI
    Joined: Jan 5, 2006
    Posts: 231

    Gemini EFI
    Member


    Lord save us from experts!!I have been driving a non intercooled '58 Chevy pickup with 12 lbs. of
    boost for 5 years. And it's a draw through!! MSD
    boost retard takes care of detonation problem.
    Yes an intercooler would make more power, but
    so would nitro.But I guess Harry's 10.0 and my 12.70 292s systems don't and wont work.
    Gemini EFI
     
  3. Gemini EFI
    Joined: Jan 5, 2006
    Posts: 231

    Gemini EFI
    Member

    I don't know when the first was but they were used in 1918 for sure. They were very common in the '30s
    Gemini EFI
     
  4. blown240
    Joined: Aug 2, 2005
    Posts: 1,817

    blown240
    Member
    from So-cal

    I have been thinking about turboing my stovebolt lately alot. I have 3 TD04-13c's that I got off of Volvos. I think a tripple turbo would be awesome just for the shock value. I used to have a twin turbo 283 in my 63 Volvo 122...
     
  5. Stone
    Joined: Nov 24, 2003
    Posts: 2,279

    Stone
    Member

    Cool thanks Gemini EFI
     
  6. 49 Fastback
    Joined: Jun 24, 2005
    Posts: 500

    49 Fastback
    Member
    from Ohio

    Would this be something one could do with a 216? Or is the babbitt pounder just too fragile (lacks pressurized oiling, etc).

    Tucker
     
  7. Hard Luck
    Joined: Apr 7, 2004
    Posts: 436

    Hard Luck
    Member

    Speaking of "know-it-all-experts" ! :rolleyes: You're the one with 6*****ing posts in a row !

    The guy asked a question....
    I answered him with information STRAIGHT OUT OF Leo Santucci's "Chevrolet Inline Six-Cylinder-Power Manual". So, I guess HE's not an expert, huh ?

    All I did was answer the guy's*****ing question, and you come in here like YOU are the know-it-all, spouting off***** about SOMEONE ELSE'S car running 10second-blah-blah-blah.....and NEVER ONCE did I say that they "don't and won't work", so pull your*****ing head out of your**** man. We're supposed to be interested in the same*****, but people that blow***** out of proportion, like you, kill it for the people that are actually interested in being informed.

    Reading your posts to date, I actually thought you were a cool guy, and****umed you knew your*****, now, I could*****ing care less.

    -Aaron
     
  8. nexxussian
    Joined: Mar 14, 2007
    Posts: 3,237

    nexxussian
    Member

    I have been looking at a similar setup for a 400 SBC. I have found alot of info here.

    Turbo Stovebolt? Koool!!!
     
  9. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    In the late '70s I ran a 270 GMC with two Corviar (TRW/RaJay) turbos in my '32 Ford coup. I used a 780 cfm Holly vacum secondary on a***** through. Each turbo ran from 3 cylinders and blew into a common log. No balance problums. Stock bottom end worked fine. It would only boost alot at WOT as without the air in there was nothing to compress. I found 17 psi to be the practical limit. Water injection, good pistons. Thing went 158.814 mph in '78
     
  10. slow64
    Joined: Apr 21, 2005
    Posts: 231

    slow64
    Member
    from MB, Canada

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.