I think the instinct of most on here would be to swap the intake/compression strokes and the power/exhaust strokes – effectively supercharging the engine.
Instead of thinking four strokes, think instead of four cycles. Still suck, squeeze, bang blow, just accomplished in 360° instead of 720.
How about a little story with this engine picture. The engine is a 1908 JAP air cooled overhead valve and is one of only four surviving examples of this engine, this engine is the actual prototype V8 engine. It was construted around the remains of what was originally a belt drive pre-World War I GNV-twin using only original parts. I think it is as cool as can be.
Sitting directly over a bunch of chains and sprockets spinning at high speed....... eh, what could go wrong?
Englishman Rudolph Ackerman received a patent on the Ackerman principal in 1818, but it appears the JAP organization never got the memo
I'm not sure if this is a unique setup. It looks like it could be. Is it an old SOHC with a belt drive?
Deduction via ratio. You see I'm young compared to most here. So if I remember, unless let's say you've lost all your faculties, sum says you experienced it and remember.
Lancia Fulvia motor. 10, 11, 13 or 20 degree shallow angle V4. Ford Essex V4. As used in European Fords and Saabs in the 1960's. A bit outside the box. Wankel rotary as per Mazda and NSU.