Register now to get rid of these ads!

What Ford Rearends Will Squeeze Under A 1954 Ford

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by uptonogood, May 21, 2008.

  1. uptonogood
    Joined: Jan 30, 2005
    Posts: 37

    uptonogood
    Member
    from Trashville

    What rearends will squeeze into a 1954 Ford Customline, and will handle a 390/C6. This is a*no-budget rod* so I'm taking all suggestions and Idea's...I'm not afraid of junkyards or tearing one out of a brokedown heap to save cash.

    Thanks
     
  2. NORCALCUERVO
    Joined: Aug 28, 2004
    Posts: 246

    NORCALCUERVO



    8 inch out of a ford mavrick
     
  3. 49SUPER6
    Joined: Jan 29, 2008
    Posts: 298

    49SUPER6
    Member

    I just finished putting a late 70's Maverick 8 in. under a 55 Ford, moved the spring perches in about an inch on each side and it went right in. Overall width is about the same, just a little narrower.
     
    JeffB2 likes this.
  4. We had an S-10 rear from an early two wheel drive that actually lived behind a 454/tunnel ram in a '55 Chevy truck.
     
  5. du$ty
    Joined: Jan 9, 2002
    Posts: 1,366

    du$ty
    Member

    8.8 outta explorer should fit..they do in shoeboxes.about the same dimensions.the 4x4 manuals are rumored to be limited slip..so posi..
     
  6. Deuce Daddy Don
    Joined: Apr 27, 2008
    Posts: 5,580

    Deuce Daddy Don
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Use the almighty Ford 9 incher!!---Neat big meaty axles----Easy to get parts!!
    3.25 gears for good milege!!----3.78 for performance!!-----Don
     
    Andrew Samson likes this.
  7. I used a 65-66 mustang under my 54 Ranch Wagon,,,as said earlier mavirick will fit also. HRP
     
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2021
  8. old4dlvr
    Joined: Oct 15, 2006
    Posts: 239

    old4dlvr
    Member

    I have fitted 57-59 Ford 9" to shoebox and 54 Fords. They are the correct width.
     
    JeffB2 likes this.
  9. rodknocker
    Joined: Jan 31, 2006
    Posts: 2,265

    rodknocker

  10. Deuce Roadster
    Joined: Sep 8, 2002
    Posts: 9,519

    Deuce Roadster
    Member Emeritus

    Ford NEVER used a 8 inch with a 390. :(
    Ford always used a heavier duty rear end.
    Find yourself a 57 - 59 Ford rear end or if money is no object ...
    Have Currie build you one of their street rods specials ( 56 inches wide )
    that are a little more narrow than the 57 - 59 Ford.

    [​IMG]

    The Currie Stage II Rod & Show Car Rearend is for more performance orientated cars that need more rear end behind them than a 8" can provide or for the customer who likes to stomp on it on occasion! The stage II is a 9" Ford and would include the 100% new 9-Plus round back Hot Rod housing and 31 spline performance axle package, 11" drum brake kit, 3rd. member with the original Ford gear case, Currie forged alloy big pinion bearing support, 1330 yoke, T.S.D. limited slip differential, and your choice of gear ratio. :) but they are NOT cheap :D
     
  11. thunderbirdesq
    Joined: Feb 15, 2006
    Posts: 7,091

    thunderbirdesq
    Member

    PM 46mopar, he just swapped his out and he's got a big ol caddy motor in his. Er, ah, I mean his wifes car, that is... I'm not sure what he used, but he said it dropped right it.
     
  12. VoodooBlade
    Joined: Feb 4, 2008
    Posts: 43

    VoodooBlade
    Member

    I put an 8.8 out of a 90s Ford explorer under a 1950 F-1 Panel.
    Fit great. make sure the explorer is a 5.0L mine had disc brakes and posi w/3:73. all straight out of the donor.
     
  13. I put a 57-59 nine inch under my 55' custom 500. Worked tits. I also found a 9 inch under a Granada, it's the only one I have ever seen, it's way narrow.
     
  14. Aman
    Joined: Dec 28, 2005
    Posts: 2,522

    Aman
    Member
    from Texas

    Thanks for sharing that site with us rodknocker...excellent reference material.
     
  15. uptonogood
    Joined: Jan 30, 2005
    Posts: 37

    uptonogood
    Member
    from Trashville

    Holly shit THANKS FOR ALL THE INFO...off to the junkyard to find me EXPLODER REAR OR MAVERICK!

    THANKS AGAIN.
     
  16. CheatersPete
    Joined: Sep 25, 2002
    Posts: 1,294

    CheatersPete
    Member

    Will a 5.0 mustang axle fit ??
     
  17. woodscaper
    Joined: Feb 20, 2011
    Posts: 100

    woodscaper
    Member

    therangerstation.com has a ton of information on the 8.8 ford axle. If you want to put horsepower to them, get a 31 spline like in most explorers and f150's, a lot of rangers and mustangs only had the 28 spline.
     
    Andrew Samson likes this.
  18. 51504bat
    Joined: May 22, 2010
    Posts: 5,203

    51504bat
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I put a Maverick under my '54 Ranch Wagon. As already said its a tad bit narrower than stock which makes the rear wheels/tires fit a easier. An 8.8 out of an early Ranger will work as well. The later Ranger 8.8's are a couple of inches wider. There are the narrower 8.8's out there along with a bunch of 7.5's
     
  19. finn
    Joined: Jan 25, 2006
    Posts: 1,355

    finn
    Member

    8.8 out of an Explorer is the most readily available rear in junkyards these days. I’ve ubiquitous 9 inch rears have pretty much dried up in most areas.

    Explorers have 31 spline axles, and most that I have seen are either 3.55 or 3.73 traction lock units. The two door models often had 4.10 gears.
     
    Andrew Samson, Just Gary and JeffB2 like this.
  20. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,601

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

  21. 54vicky
    Joined: Dec 13, 2011
    Posts: 1,599

    54vicky
    Member

    good info but I think he figured it out back in 08
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.