Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects What SBF mounts you prefer?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 50 COUPE, Feb 12, 2019.

  1. 50 COUPE
    Joined: Jan 14, 2011
    Posts: 78

    50 COUPE
    Member

    Planning to put a 302 and c4 in my 59 F100 panel in the spring and wondered who has done this swap and which style motor mounts you used. I see the type that bolt to the frame rails and the tubular type that are weld in. Any advantage in one over the other, except not having to do the measuring and welding? Do the bolt in ones give good structural support? Does the tubular one cause clearance problems for the oil pan? Just looking for opinions from those experienced with this. Open to ideas on how you may have built your own mounts as well!
     
    chryslerfan55 likes this.
  2. bdynpnt
    Joined: Feb 9, 2009
    Posts: 354

    bdynpnt
    Member

    I used a tubular mount out of a 67 Econoline that had a 240 engine to put a 289 in my 56 f100 all I had to do to make it fit was cut the tube off just outside the inboard flanges it fit in the frame perfect it bolted to the top of the rail with 2 bolts on either side .and used stock ford mounts to engine .and it was curved so any oil pan would fit.of course this was back in 73 so may be hard to find now

    Sent from my SM-G965U using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  3. Moon50F3
    Joined: Sep 18, 2014
    Posts: 216

    Moon50F3
    Member

    I put a 289 in a ‘56 F100 years ago using one of those tubular mounts. I can’t remember who made it, but they don’t interfere with the pan. They are made to swap that engine in. If I remember right, it was all bolt in, no weld.


    Pat
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.