Register now to get rid of these ads!

What year Mustang II front ends work under a '53 chevy truck

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by flight75, Oct 19, 2010.

  1. flight75
    Joined: Nov 16, 2009
    Posts: 32

    flight75
    Member

    Like the title says, are there only certain years of MII front ends that work under a '53 chevy truck or were all the Mustang II suspensions the same??

    Thanks,

    Steve
     
  2. roddinron
    Joined: May 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,676

    roddinron
    Member

    You're not thinking of taking one out of a mustang are you? If so, do yourself a favor and order the cross member from one of the many manufactures who make them for your truck.
     
  3. Weasel
    Joined: Dec 30, 2007
    Posts: 6,695

    Weasel
    Member

    Truck + factory Mustang II not good - truck too heavy. Try something like a Corvette C4. Truck crossmembers available from www.flatoutengineering.com. Or a Volare might be another option - my 0.02c.
     
  4. Normal Norman
    Joined: Aug 9, 2006
    Posts: 510

    Normal Norman
    Member
    from Goshen IN.

    If your trying to do this on the cheap you are gonna have problems. You would be better off buying the aftermarket crossmember to install the M2 or update the exisiting beam axle. New king pins and rod ends, disc brake kit, etc. Normal Norman
     
  5. flight75
    Joined: Nov 16, 2009
    Posts: 32

    flight75
    Member

    I already have a pacer front end in the truck but from a spare parts standpoint I was thinking MII. The only problem with the pacer front end which looks to be much more stout is the track is 5 inches wider and will not work for me, so my option is to cut a five inch section out of the pacer front end and re-weld and struggle to get parts or go with the MII susp, and have ample parts available.


    Steve
     
  6. Hi!
    Joined: Oct 4, 2006
    Posts: 731

    Hi!
    Member
    from SoCal

    Do a S-10 front stub if you can, Its cheap and has everything you want or do a aftermarket mustang swap.
     
  7. Cymro
    Joined: Jul 1, 2008
    Posts: 758

    Cymro
    Member

    Try a Jag front end
     
  8. FrozenMerc
    Joined: Sep 4, 2009
    Posts: 3,329

    FrozenMerc
    Member

    To answer your original question, Look for a '74 to '78 Mustang, Pinto, or Bobcat. The suspensions were all the same, the only difference was in the spring rate.

    However, you would be much better served to get an aftermarket MII crossmember. You will have to narrow your frame considerably (4 inches on the '48 to '52 Ford F-1's, I would imagine the Chevies are similar) to use the original MII cross member.

    Good Luck.
     
  9. Check with Fatman Fabrications in Charlotte, NC. If a MII will work in it, Brent and his group have already done it! Good people, too!
     
  10. dsr_54
    Joined: Nov 24, 2008
    Posts: 278

    dsr_54
    Member



    Almost..... Pinto and bobcat are the same. The Mustang II is the same except for the strut rods are a different angle. The mounts for the strut rods are bolt in on mustang II and are part of the unibody on pinto / bobcat.

    I too think you would be better with and aftermarket front end made for your truck mustang II style is fine. If doing on the cheap look at other front clips that others have mentioned.
     
  11. fordcragar
    Joined: Dec 28, 2005
    Posts: 3,198

    fordcragar
    Member
    from Yakima WA.

    To add to this, the track on the Mustang II was about 1 inch wider. Someone told me this years ago and I didn't believe it until we measured it on two of my cars (one with a Mustang II crossmember and the other with a Pinto). All of the components are the same, but the crossmembers are different. The Mustang II frame rails are wider than the Pinto.
     
  12. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,593

    theHIGHLANDER
    Member

    If I recall, an S-10 front frame section is really close in track width. You could simply lop off the front frame and have at it. Don't forget to add at least 1/2" to the wheelbase if you do either. Dropping the front on AD trucks without doing that will give it an "overbite" look as in wheels too far back. Good luck with either choice. Each has it's benefits and will net spares on the cheap.
     
  13. dsr_54
    Joined: Nov 24, 2008
    Posts: 278

    dsr_54
    Member


    I did not know that, but I guess I never did Measure them both.... Learn something new every day. That is why i love the HAMB !
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.